The numbers used to support the “pandemic of the unvaxxed” were generated when few people were vaxxed. The numbers are getting less and less supportive as more and more people are vaxxed. From Dr. Joseph Mercola at childrenshealthdefense.org:

  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House and most mainstream media, what we have now is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” with 95% to 99% of Cv-related hospitalizations and deaths being attributed to the unvaccinated.
  • To achieve that statistic, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June. The vast majority of the U.S. population was unvaccinated during that timeframe.
  • By Jan. 1 only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots and as of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.”
  • Natural immunity offers robust protection against all variants, whereas vaccine-induced immunity can’t. The reason for this is because when you recover from the natural infection, you have both antibodies and T cells against all parts of the virus, not just the spike protein.
  • According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Delta variant is both more transmissible and more dangerous than the original virus and previous variants, but real-world data show it is actually weaker and far less dangerous, even though it does spread more easily.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House and most mainstream media, what we have now is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” According to the official narrative, 99% of Cv-19 deaths and 95% of COVID-related hospitalizations are occurring among the unvaccinated. In a July 16 White House press briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated.” But as reported by Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham on “The Ingraham Angle,” “that statistic is grossly misleading,” and in an Aug. 5 video statement, Walensky inadvertently revealed how that 95% to 99% statistic was created. 

Continue reading→


This manipulation/obfuscation of statistics to suit a political narrative is nothing new and we’ve seen it most notably with the “climate change” issue. Although corruption in America, particularly when powerful vested interests like the pharmaceutical industry are involved, is a significant problem, the operative question for us is how much corruption applies in Jacindaland? The very low figures in the case of the China virus suggests that public health officials are largely honest (unlike the Jacinda cabinet), but that could change with political pressure, of course. —Eds