A document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world. Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported. Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious. This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.
We examine the implications for government. Up until now, New Zealand GPs and hospitals have been provided with a fact sheet from Pfizer listing 21 possible adverse events as a result of vaccination. All of these are minor, requiring little or no treatment other than rest, with the exception of severe allergic reactions, myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart).
As a result, most of the many thousands of New Zealanders reporting adverse effects post vaccination have been sent home with little more than advice to take an aspirin and rest. Some have been told that their conditions may be unrelated medical events, psychosomatic, or due to anxiety on their part.
Relying on the short official Pfizer fact sheet as a guide, Medsafe, our NZ medicines regulatory body, has only accepted one out of the 100+ deaths actually reported to them as related to vaccination. Most are listed as unrelated, under investigation, or unknowable. By contrast, the NZ Health Forum and other groups have collected unofficial reports of adverse effects and death proximate to vaccination. Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum, 270 have already been investigated by medical professionals and closely linked to known adverse effects.
Following the publication of the new Pfizer document many more are expected to be connected with vaccination. Reports describe symptoms such as chest pain, brain fog, extreme fatigue, neurological symptoms, tachycardia, stroke, heart attacks, and many more. Collected data suggests that as many as two-thirds of adverse event enquiries made to medical staff by vaccine recipients have not been reported to CARM—the NZ system of adverse event reporting.
Medsafe itself estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that in NZ only 5% of adverse events are reported. As a result the NZ public is completely unaware of the extent of reported possible risks of vaccination.
The just-released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can be downloaded from websites is entitled 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021 Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021.
Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.
How did this happen without anyone’s knowledge?
Even though the Pfizer vaccine had undergone very short trials and had provisional approval only, Medsafe did not update its CARM adverse event reporting system to make it mandatory rather than voluntary.
Medsafe did not advise GPs and Hospital staff to be on high alert for adverse events and report them rapidly and in detail.
The Government ignored the unprecedented numbers of adverse events being reported to Medsafe and circulating in the community and on social media.
The Government instituted a public relations, promotional, and media campaign advising the public that the Pfizer covid-19 mRNA vaccine was completely safe and free of serious side effects, giving the impression that there were no side effects—not even the known serious effects of heart inflammation that Pfizer had already admitted.
Unaccountably, conditions imposed by the contract that our Government signed with Pfizer for the supply of vaccines have not been made public. We suspect that the contract contains standard clauses similar to those used with drugs that have completed safety trials, such as a provision that public discussion of adverse events may only be undertaken in conjunction with the company supplying the drug. If this is the case, it will have hamstrung Medsafe and our Government in their approach to assessment and public discussion of adverse events.
What are the new risks of vaccination?
Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.
How has this affected New Zealand?
While even the official Medsafe record of adverse effects and the unofficial lists show that the immediate risks of covid vaccination could be as much as 50–300 times greater than even the most risky of previous traditional vaccines (such as the smallpox jab), and while the long term effects are unknown, 90% of eligible New Zealanders have gone ahead with vaccination having accepted the assurances of safety and efficacy from the government, or having been forced to get vaccinated under threat of loss of employment and freedom of movement. Feeling the fear of covid that has been generated by reports in the international and local media, most people completing vaccination heaved a great sigh of relief—that is one huge worry off my mind, now I can get on with my life.
Those finding that no immediate insurmountable reaction had surfaced (the majority) understandably agreed with the government: “What is all the fuss about? Why shouldn’t everyone do this, or be made to do this? It is a social good that will protect everyone”
BUT there is a huge iceberg in the path of the good ship New Zealand hidden under the waves of relief. Thousands are quietly suffering debilitating illness, unacknowledged and in some cases untreated by their doctors. For those who survived vaccination without immediate injury this was not a problem because they didn’t know about it apart from one or two complaints from friends that might just be random coincidences.
This has brought about a division in New Zealand society which the government created in the name of public safety. Thousands of dedicated servants of the nation including teachers, health workers, and others are being stigmatised and forced out of their jobs in a manner horrifyingly reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. The government did this despite knowing that the Pfizer vaccine was neither fully tested, safe, nor particularly effective. Judges handed down decisions in courts supporting the government mandates unaware of crucial mRNA vaccine safety data, all because Pfizer had withheld this information, and the government had not done its due diligence.
Had the true position been known, the High Court’s NZ Bill of Rights analysis may well have been different and its provision which guarantees that every individual should be able to make their own medical choices might still be intact.
Pfizer’s conclusions
Pfizer concludes the released document with a statement “Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit–risk balance for BNT162b2.” PM stands for the Post Marketing data set they are evaluating of 42,086 reported adverse events. Pfizer makes this bald claim of benefit despite admitting that “the magnitude of underreporting is unknown”.
This document contains no further substantive information in support of this claim of benefit–risk balance other than a mysterious reference to “the known safety profile of the vaccine”.
The benefit–risk argument is in essence saying: covid-19 is a serious illness and our calculations show that more people will be injured by the disease than are being injured by the vaccine, therefore there will be a net benefit. This argument falls over because of at least three very important factors: Firstly treatment options have improved and thereby the risk of serious illness and death from covid has been greatly reduced. Secondly the risk of covid is not evenly spread. People with comorbidities (other conditions) and the elderly are at very high risk. Most other people are at very low risk.
Thus vaccination could subject people at low risk from covid to a higher risk from vaccination. Approaches to preventive health education can reduce the covid risk to people with comorbidities more than vaccination can. For example a study published in the BMJ found that people following a plant based diet have a 73% reduced risk of serious illness. Data from the UK Biobank has been analysed by researchers from Manchester and Oxford Universities and the West Indies who found that shift workers (who typically have disrupted bioclocks) have three times the risk of being hospitalised with covid.
Preventive remedies include changes in diet such as the introduction of more fresh fruit, vegetables, and fibre, and reductions in known unhealthy habits such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption, an overly sedentary lifestyle, a predominance of ultra processed foods, and many more.
The third and most significant reason the benefit–risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.
How could a single vaccine have such a wide range of effects?
The technical reasons why mRNA vaccines can have such broad effects on human health are understood by those working in gene therapy. Perfectly stable DNA function is critical to life. In turn, cell function integrity is critical to maintaining DNA. Individual cells contain mechanisms to repair their own DNA as many as 70,000 times a day.
From this perspective, the in vitro laboratory study recently published in Viruses 2021, 13,2056, is indicative. It suggests a possible mechanism for vaccine harm. The study found that the spike protein localises in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding access of key DNA repair proteins.
The findings reveal a potential molecular pathway by which the covid spike protein might impede adaptive immunity. They underscore the potential side effects of the full-length spike-based mRNA vaccines. Despite a degree of cellular autonomy, the nervous system and the physiology must and does function as a whole.
The entire nervous system including the immune system is a ‘part and whole’ network. The whole is in every part, the DNA is in every cell, but cell function is also related to a generalised and interconnected genetic network—the holistic functioning of the physiological network is critical to its efficiency. Thus physiological network stability (health) can be impaired by the introduction of pieces of active genetic code (biologic instructions) like those contained in mRNA vaccines.
An analogy will make this clear. We are familiar with computer networks. A very common backbone of most commercial systems is produced by Microsoft. Each computer contains the Microsoft system and the network also runs under its system. The system is supported by computer code—a set of complex instructions written by Microsoft. Individual computers can perform standalone tasks and can communicate with other computers to keep the organisation running smoothly.
This can be compared to the physiology. There are many systems in the body: immune system, circulatory system, digestive system, limbic system, homeostatic mechanisms, musculoskeletal structure, neural networks, and so on. They perform apparently stand alone functions, but all run on the basis of the same genetic code contained in our DNA and communicate with one another during the process of maintaining health.
Back to our analogy: office staff sometimes send messages full of spelling errors to one another but this doesn’t harm the network. If, however, a computer virus written in code is sent by one computer it can overwhelm and crash network function because it affects the operating system. Some networks are protected by good firewalls and others are vulnerable. The Covid vaccine introduces a sequence of information written in genetic code into our physiology.
It is no wonder that it could elicit such a very broad range of adverse effects, some of which are so serious as to be analogous to a computer network crash. Some individuals have strong immune systems and are little affected, others experience problems in one or other systems. The fact that a sequence of foreign code has been introduced into the physiology produces major risks to health, risks that those working in gene therapy for the last few decades are very familiar with.
The extremely broad range of adverse effects revealed by the Pfizer document is the physiological signature of a general control system failure, a failure of the body’s overall integration and function. It is not plausible to suggest otherwise. That is why experts in genomics, even as I write, are pondering fundamental questions about the action and safety of mRNA vaccines. They are also urging caution.
Conclusion
The NZ government agreed commercial terms with a single company for vaccine supply. It is possible that vital information was withheld. The public was kept in ignorance of known risks. This has divided our society and undermined our fundamental Kiwi tolerance on the basis of not only incomplete but misleading safety data.
The government is asleep at the wheel. Knowing full well that safety trials were incomplete, the government apparently accepted information supplied by multinational commercial interests at face value. This should be a ‘never again’ moment. There are huge lessons to be learned and an apology owed to the whole population.
The provisions of the NZ BIll of Rights should be given constitutional status. The vaccine mandates should be withdrawn and those affected by them compensated. The proposed vaccination of 5–11 year olds should be stopped.
Pingback: a vast array of previously unknown Pfizer covid ‘vaccine’ adverse effects is released by Pfizer — Waikanae Watch – New Human New Earth Communities
jane vile said:
This needs to be widely proclaimed throughout New Zealand so the mass hypnotized wake up.
Diane Burns said:
look into graphene hydroxide, I think your posts are great.. people need to wake up soon..
MAGA MIKE said:
Nobody can explain why the vaccinated are more likely to get COVID and die.
contactnorthstarnewslettercom said:
If I were still working for TVNZ/TVOne, or any NZ media, which I did for three decades up to 1990, this and follow-up articles would be the lead story every night – with even deeper research….which, to keep it short, I have done over the next three decades.
I moved to the USA in 1990, but have continued as a reporter and author, subject matter including the New World Order, and its long-term objectives.
These are NOT conspiracy theories.
My point is that this article, I think very wisely, makes no assumptions about anything. It is not only factual, it is the truth – but, that said, there are underlying facts and truths that explain precisely why the “vaccines” were created, and why the government (like many around the world) signed a secret agreement with Pfizer, and, again, in lockstep with those other governments, is actually complicit in an attempted cover-up of the EXPECTED deaths and adverse reactions.
It’s a shocking and sick discovery, but as thousands of truly credentialed scientists in many fields find their discoveries of parasites and graphene oxide and nanobots in the bioweapon that has been sold as a “:vaccine,” and have their concerns censored or ignored by all the mainstream and Big Tech social media, the facts are slowly trickling out – and this article is adding to that trickle, which must soon become a flood of awareness, which some refer to as The Great Awakening.
For my part, I have written three books – two of which were selling extremely well on Amazon – until they “unpublished” them shortly before the US presidential election. They were about the Deep State and the history of the Globalists.
Likewise, YouTube suddenly deplatformed my channel, on which I had made and posted over 100 video reports about current political events, gained over one million views, and 20,000 subscribers.
I mention this simply to reinforce what I have said about there being an underlying reason why governments are complicit in keeping these endless mandatyes and lockdowns and new variants and booster shots forever going on and on – nwith the almost complete cooperation of the mainstream propaganda media.
Unfortunately, that includes the mainstream NZ media, which I understand has been bought off with government money – BUT I saw that coming when they split TVNZ Into TVOne and TVTwo – since when more channels have been added, many newspapers have been absorbed into corporate ownership, and willing patsies have been given control positions in all of them.
In NZ media, I was Bill Knight – my first name – but in the US, I have chosen my second name, Michael, and as Michael Knight I have moved on from the YouTube issue and now write a regular free newsletter, but also create and upload videos to my Knightbeatnews (or Knightbeat News) channel on Bitchute.
I also have a GAB account and follow several New Zealand accounts there, as well as some in Australia and the US.
ALL of this work is about giving a voice to the truth – long gone from the propaganda presstitutes in the mainstream – but seriously gathering steam in the alternative sources of information.
While I have lived in the US these past 30-odd years, one does not lose one’s love of home country, and its people, including family who, like millions of kiwis have been misled by Pfizer and Jacinda and both governing parties, and are being swept into that destructive – killer – lockdown/vaccine/booster shot/bioweapon genocide agenda.
Harsh words?
Truth (based on years of research) can be very hard to swallow.
It is no coincidence, as far as I am concerned, that I found this blog.
A reference I found on GAB to Ardern buying a property way down south got me here, because I have recently made a number of videos about the mounting pushback in New Zealand, and about Ardern in particular.
In closing, let me say I sincerely wish to incorporate the information in Drt Guy’s article into a future video. (Yes, I did a quick dig and discovered your Facebook page – but I have been deplatformed by Facebook as well, because I was spreading “disinformation” about Trump and Covid). Censorship runs wide and deep.
I would not normally do so, but what follows are my email address, and links to my Bitchute video channel in the hope that you will contact me personally, and also see what I do in my own small way to bring facts and truth to this most serious issue that is costing so many lives.
If you (or anyone reading this) can create a GAB presence, you will then be able to use that as well as this blog to alert many more Kiwis to the underlying facts and truths that all Kiwis need to be made aware of – and if only ONE person is benefited, it has been worth the effort.
contact (at) northstarnewsletter.com
My Gab Page https://gab.com/wmknight
BitChute Channel
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/udxu3i8uj9Un/
This video about Ardern (and sheep) has had over 5000 views.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vfNC9GDd9li4/
Sincerely.
Michael Knight.
Jonathan Berry said:
Check this out too: https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/
contactnorthstarnewslettercom said:
Interesting graphs. Bottom line, in layman terms, “unreliable” indicates someone monkeyed with the numbers to produce the original graphs.
And it seems to me that such statistical analyses are hampered by the fact that deaths can be miscategorised at source anyway, just as “experts” (at propaganda) are now saying the dramatic upsurge in heart attacks among sportsmen and others, post-vaccination, is a consequence of – wait for it – “post pandemic stress disorder.”
“It’s not the vaccine folks. They’re just messed in the head with stress. That’s why they drop dead while playing sports.”
OR…”there’s a new variant so virulent that it is causing these issues…get another shot folks.”
John Smith said:
Great article. The dietary changes that are best against covid are likely ketogenic diets leading to good fat metabolism. Less to do with plant intake or high fibre diets. Fibres positive health effects are overstated and not based on any good evidence. Fibre is likely even bad for GI problems.
Dr. Paul Mason on covid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lJPjsuftmQ
Dr. Paul Mason on fibre.
Michael Knight said:
It goes deeper than that in order to eliminate grapohene oxide particles.
Nacetlycysteine has been recommended, among other things, by the Spanish scientists who first isolated the graphene oxide under a microscope.
I’d suggest a search for Dr Zelenko who has also come up with a protocol after successfully treating hundreds of COVID patients.
Additional Vitamin D (15iu a day) and Vitamin C pilus zinc also strengthen the immune system.
Ivermectin and hydroxychloquine are extremely effective at combating SARS (aka flu) viruses, hence they have been demonized by Fauci and others, because emergency use of an unproven vaccine can only apply if there is no existing and effective prophylactic.
Dr Hatchard may well have also researched this and may have some suggestions?
J said:
Then it makes sense that one of the outcomes of G4 is that they plan to cut our meat intake. This way they take away access to the diet elements that would help against covid and thus make the population (keep it) vulnerable to the disease.
Martin Whyle said:
Point of clarification
In the 4th paragraph of this article I read – Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum…
I assume these are overseas deaths being investigated to compare with NZ incidents.
I understand NZ death talley is 32 overall.
Does anyone have any detailed information about Covid affects and complications for NZ 0 – 20s?
Waikanae watchers said:
The latest Medsafe report (#36 at this point) states in regard to recorded fatalities: “Up to and including 6 November 2021, a total of 103 deaths were reported to CARM after the administration of the Comirnaty vaccine. Following medical assessments by CARM and Medsafe it has been determined that:
47 of these deaths are unlikely related to the COVID-19 vaccine
47 deaths could not be assessed due to insufficient information
8 cases are still under investigation.
1 death was likely due to vaccine induced myocarditis (awaiting Coroner’s determination)”
The citizen’s register compiled by Health Forum NZ stands at about 240. It’s likely the Medsafe figure is under-reported (and clearly heavily downplayed) while the Citizens’s Register will be somewhat overstated. Thus striking the mid-point of the two is probably close to the real figure.
Chris Dunstan said:
Hi
Thanks for declaring the truth.
The best source of accurate information for NZ deaths and adverse effects is NZDSOS.com
Beware someone??? has made a look alike website.
Regards
Chris Dunstan
Tauranga
NZ
0274931108
Karlin said:
Hi Chris, can you let us know which NZDSOS website is not the right one? Has it got a different URL?
And have you asked for it to be shut down?
Or emailed them?
Thank you
Waikanae watchers said:
The real one is https://nzdsos.com// — the fake one set up by Jacinda government agents is https://nzdsos.co.nz/ The same agents tried to set up a copycat site of our one.
David Cooper said:
It’s funny how the Government lies in that it is the “unvaccinated” that are dangerous and the”spreaders” which is totally false statistically. But to prove my point take a look at the latest variant Omicron. Apparently, it has spread to over 40 countries already in such a short time. But the funny thing is, The unvaccinated are not allowed to fly internationally! So how was it spread? Logic would tell you it was from those that are vaccinated. BOTH can get it and spread it and this is why discrimination and mandatory vaccines are a waste of time and totally unethical and causing much more harm than good.
Pingback: Pifzer-unwillingly-release a vast array of adverse ‘vaccine’ effects! | Wellington News
Pingback: Coronavirus Covid-19 Research History – Index | progressiveissuesblog
paora66 said:
What a lucid, incisive and rather “kind” article. Thank you for writing this. This is another “smoking gun” and if MedSafe et al had access to this report back April then criminal charges should follow for those in the know. I am sure the PM and DG Health would be superb at deflecting responsibility and/or sorry-not-sorry apologies
Karlin said:
Thank you for this info, its refreshing.
Can you pass comment on this news story, link below?
And does it conflict with this info above, saying that:
“Gene therapy, in the classical sense, involves making deliberate changes to a patient’s DNA in order to treat or cure them. mRNA vaccines will not enter a cell’s nucleus that houses your DNA genome. There is zero risk of these vaccines integrating into our own genome or altering our genetic makeup.”
It’s really confusing to me, my head hurts as I feel information is contradicted everywhere and how do know where the truth is, comes from, is to be trusted?
Any info you have or reflection on this news link, would be most welcome, thank you.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-mrna-gene-idUSL1N2PH16N
Waikanae watchers said:
Reuters is intimately connected with Pfizer and thus totally biased — here is a recent article on the serious conflict of interest:–
“A new report reveals that James C. Smith, the chairman and former Chief Executive Officer of Big Media giant Reuters is in fact a top investor and board member for Big Pharma’s Pfizer, arguably the biggest COVID vaccine producer in the world today.
“According to the National Pulse, Smith was elected to the Pfizer board in 2014 and joined the pharmaceutical company’s Corporate Governance and Science and Technology Committees. His positions in both global companies poses the question, is there a conflict of interest going on, as Reuters continues to defend Big Pharma and promote vaccines in the face of critics?
“Smith currently serves as the chairman of the London-based charity Thomson Reuters Foundation, which is known for publishing news and information for billions of its readers. He also served as Reuters’ President, Chief Executive Officer, and on the Board of Director of Reuters since 2012 before retiring in 2020. Smith has been with Reuters since 1987, when they were still known as the Thomson Newspaper group.
“Smith also oversaw legal, tax and accounting, and intellectual property and science businesses when he served as the CEO of Reuters’ professional division. He moved on to manage the North America operations for the global news organization.
“Ian Read, Pfizer’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer said in 2014 when Smith was elected to the pharmaceutical company’s board that the then-54 year old executive brought “leadership and operational and international business experience” to the company, BusinessWire reported.
“The report highlights a serious conflict of interest, as in the last year alone, Reuters published over 22,000 articles mentioning Pfizer, a company that Smith is also an executive at. Comparing articles that were published about other COVID vaccine brands, Pfizer appeared to have the most stories published about them. Reuters published only 18,000 related to Johnson & Johnson and even less, or just 8,191 articles related to Moderna.
“Moreover, Smith also serves on the board of Partnering Against Corruption Initiative at the World Economic Forum (WEF) and is a member of the organization’s International Business Advisory Boards of British American Business and the Atlantic Council. The WEF has long been linked to the “great reset” movement, in which “stakeholder capitalism” takes hold of governments across the world, political commentator Glenn Beck warned.
“People behind the Great Reset
WEF has been criticized over the past year for praising COVID lockdowns for “quietly improving cities around the world” by decreasing noise and air pollution in cities around the world. In a video posted and then deleted from its social media channels, the WEF said that “seismic noise” has been recorded to be at its lowest due to the COVID lockdowns, allowing scientists to record small earthquakes that they would otherwise miss.
“The WEF has also found critics in several leaders, including former Archbishop of St. Louis Cardinal Raymond Burke, who described the WEF’s “great reset” as the “most alarming crisis” that is fueled by the “worldwide spread of Marxist materialism.” Noted Italian Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano argued that President Donald Trump is “the one who opposes” the deep state and the globalists inside the WEF.
“Meanwhile, Justin Haskins, the Editorial Director at The Heartland Institute and a prominent “great reset” critic, agrees with Vigano, and indicates that the great reset is more than just a theory.
“This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a well-documented movement among many of the world’s most powerful people,” Haskins said. “Fundamentally, this is a radical and complete transformation of everything that we do in our society.”
“Haskins added, “Over the past four years, Donald Trump has been the single greatest roadblock for people who are pushing this internationalist globalist sort of agenda.”
(source : https://www.christianitydaily.com/articles/14184/20211207/reuters-chairman-is-pfizer-investor-and-board-member%E2%80%94a-serious-conflict-of-interest-report-says.htm)
Karlin said:
Thank you for clarity!