from Casey Costello, NZ First MP

NZ First’s candidates are a real mixed bag, but Casey Costello is one of the best.

I have spent much of my life thinking about what it means to be a New Zealander.

I am Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Hau, and Ngāti Wai. I descend from Tāmati Waka Nene and Patuone, both of whom were signatories of the Treaty of Waitangi and early leaders of the idea that Māori and Pākehā had entered into a shared political future.

On the other side of my family, I descend from Anglo-Irish settlers who arrived here in the 1860s.

I am proud of all of that. I know where I come from, and I know the stories of my ancestors. But none of those things makes me one bit more or less entitled to call this country home than any other New Zealand citizen. My ancestry is part of my personal story.

It is my citizenship that makes me part of our national story. Because, first and foremost, I am a New Zealander.

Citizenship should be the great equaliser. It’s the sacred promise that however your family arrived here, whatever your race, religion, or background, you stand alongside every other New Zealander as an absolute equal before the law and within our democracy.

It is a principle New Zealand First has defended consistently: one law for all, equal citizenship, and a country in which your political rights do not depend on your race or ancestry.

And I believe that principle is going to matter enormously in the next Parliament.

When I joined the police as a 20 year old, I took an oath to uphold the law without favour or affection, malice or ill will. The law is not supposed to ask who you are before deciding how you should be treated. I have carried that solemn oath beyond my time in blue.

Equality doesn’t mean we all have to be identical or forget where we came from. It simply means ancestry should neither elevate you above your fellow citizens nor diminish your standing among them. You shouldn’t need the “right” bloodline to have your voice heard, and you shouldn’t ever have to apologise for who your ancestors are, no matter if they arrived in a waka, ship, or aeroplane.

But, I’ll be honest, right now, our democracy faces a real turning point.

We have watched for years as an agenda of race-based division has tried to fracture our country into competing categories of citizens with different political rights. New Zealand First has been steadfast in attempting to hold back the tide, but there is only so much we can do against the bigger parties.

In November we need more seats.

The bigger, well-funded parties will compromise when the pressure gets turned up. We’ve seen it happen before. New Zealand First is the only party with the courage to hold the line.

But courage doesn’t pay for billboards, ads, or town hall meetings. If we are going to fight back against this tide of division and win more seats in November, we need the firepower to do it.

Other parties seem to think that citizenship is just an administrative detail, a passport, or a box to tick on a form. One that means little and can easily be doled out.

It means much more than that. Citizenship is a commitment to a country.

It’s the decision to join a national community and say, “This is my nation too. Its future is my future, and its democratic institutions are mine to protect.”

That is why New Zealand First has always stood for one law for all. And why we accept and respect both the rights and the responsibilities that come with belonging to the group called New Zealanders. 

New Zealand First believes citizenship itself deserves to be respected and protected.

We do not believe New Zealand should continue drifting towards a system where people are divided into political categories according to ancestry. Nor do we believe there is anything unreasonable about saying that the most fundamental democratic rights should be connected to citizenship.

If you are deciding who governs New Zealand, who writes our laws, who spends our taxes and what direction our country takes, citizenship is a natural and meaningful threshold.

That does not diminish the contribution of permanent residents or migrants. Before entering Parliament, I spent years advocating for exploited migrants. I have seen first hand the enormous contribution people from around the world make to New Zealand.

People can come here, build businesses, raise families, contribute to their communities, and make New Zealand their home. But citizenship should still represent something distinct; the formal decision to join our nation. A privilege, honour, and responsibility.

Otherwise we should ask ourselves:

What does New Zealand citizenship actually mean?

New Zealand First believe it means equal standing before the law, rights accompanied by responsibilities, and participation in a common democracy.

If you believe that, if you refuse to let your citizenship (or fellow New Zealanders’) be downgraded into a second-tier status based on race, then sitting quietly on the sidelines is no longer an option.

Believing in equal rights isn’t enough anymore. We need you actively in this fight with us. We need supporters delivering leaflets in their neighborhoods, placing signs on their fences, and talking to their friends and family before it’s too late.

why are Leftists such war enthusiasts these days?

from the Daily Express 

The UK is set to call up 95,000 retirees to help prepare for war with Russia as WW3 fears explode.

A major drill to mobilise an army of veterans is being planned to take place next year.

Louise Sandher-Jones, the Armed Forces minister, said a “strategic reserve” of 95,000 retired troops will be called into action “on a scale we haven’t seen for a long time”.

The operation comes as fears increase regarding conflict with Russia by 2030.

British factories have already been threatened by Moscow due to building drones for Ukraine with Western intelligance officials warning that Vladimir Putin is waging a campaign that could trigger a war.

The drill comes as the government’s cost-cutting on military plans is facing scrutiny after it emerged that John Healey, the Chancellor, would fail to commit to spending 3 per cent of gross domestic product on defence by 2030.

It’s reported that details of the drill are still being finalised but it is expected to test the ability of veterans to be called on and equipped in an emergency.

Ms Sandher-Jones said on Monday: “The strategic reserve is a real commitment for those that are in it and they will be exercised as part of our exercise programme next year where we will go through measures to call out, use, equip and all the rest of the procedures we’d have to go through to use the strategic reserve properly.”

The drill will serve as a test for the Government after it was revealed that it had forgotten much of the network of retired soldiers and officers from the Army, RAF and Navy.

The law currently states that all former regular and reserve officers retain recall liability for life

The Ministry of Defence are also legally obliged to maintain contact with former military staff in the first six years after they leave full-time service.

This group of former military staff differs from the reserve forces, which is made up from people who volunteer part-time to serve in the military.

comment by Russell Malcolm of The Hearty Hardy Out Law Party

You [Stuffing] idiots. Britian is paying for and building millions of bombs, drones and killer weapons to attack Russian with (and claim Ukraine has done it).

Then these incredible dumb clowns say, “Russia is threatening You.”

Fact: Not until you used Ukraine as a proxy to attack Russia! And that’s exactly whats been going on. The people of Ukraine and Russia don’t want any war. Neither did Putin, so stop lying.

I hope Russian people do the intelligent thing and destroy your weapon making factories and those financing them in your own country.

Just how dumb can people be? Very frigging dumb.

The people of Russia have every right and duty to protect themselves.

If the people of Britain have any sense you would eliminate your own traitors and aggressors who want this war.

Hermann Goering of the 3rd Reich provided the explanation to the above question:-

the EU autocrats are getting desperate about their censorship

EU boss Ursula von der Lyin’ goes to Greenland to buy support for her EuroReich

from Europe Diplomatic

(pic by Rod Long)

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a partnership deal with Greenland ‌worth €200 million, which she said highlighted the strategic importance of the Arctic island for the bloc.

“Greenland can count on the EU. That was my ⁠message during my last visit. Today, I am back to deliver the real results of our close cooperation. With a new EU-Greenland Partnership package, worth €200 million,” said von der Leyen.

“Greenland is not part of the European Union and yet @vonderleyen, during her trip there, just wrote an additional check for 200,000,000 €. Given that France’s net contribution is 17%, that’s 34,000,000 € that the French just paid…Remind me, how many filtering hoods for our firefighters can we buy with such a sum of money?” the post reads.

During her visit to the capital Nuuk Ursula von der Leyen offered 200 million euros in support over the next two years to help Greenland tackle climate change, boost internet connections and improve hydropower plants, fisheries and education.

Funds are also earmarked for better housing, support to small businesses and sustainable tourism. Von der Leyen also said that she wants to double EU budget support to Greenland to around half a billion euros ($580 million) from 2028.

“Greenland can count on the EU,” she said, after signing an EU-Greenland declaration with Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen.

🇩🇰🇬🇱🇺🇸 Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Ursula von der Leyen have stated that they will not hand over Greenland to Trump.

The Golden Age of men’s tennis is over

By Roger Childs

Frances Tiafoe (11) turned in a dazzling performance to upset Daniil Medvedev (7) and return to his third U.S. Open quarterfinal in four years. –Daniel Shirley, The Athletic, 6 September 2026

The legends are now out of contention

From 2003 to 2023 sixty six of the 80 grand slams were won by Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. Fed and Rafa have retired and the Joker, having been knocked out in the first round of this year US Open, may well do so too. These three legends were very hard to beat in their time and there was always magnificent tennis when they played against each other.

Andy Murray and Stan Wawrinka won three slams each at that time and played on beyond their best years. 41 year old “Stan the Man” was in the first round of the current US Open but after a couple of close sets was well beaten by Italian Matteo Berrettini. Stan is very popular at Flushing Meadows and received a great reception after what might be his last appearance.

Contenders for the US Open Men’s Singles

The number one seed and French grand slam winner Alexander Zverev is through to the fourth round as are Carlos Alcaraz, Americans Ben Shelton and Alex Mickelsen, and Karen Kharchanov. Last year in the final Alcaraz beat Jannik Sinner in a high quality match, but the Italian, currently world number one withdrew this year because of a knee injury.

Alcaraz is the likely winner in 2026 as Zverev is not in top form and needed five sets to get through each of rounds one and two. He is not an appealing player and bounces the ball 15-20 times before serving which is very boring.

There are plenty of other very good players in the draw, but only Alcaraz is in the class of the three legends.

Contenders for the US Open women’s singles

Aryna Sabalenka from Belarus won last year and as number one seed is favoured to do so again. She has her critics as she is an extravert on court, and does dress colorfully and flaunt her good looks which puts some people off.

 Her home country has supported Putin in his war against Ukraine and although Sabalenka has come out against the war, some of her opponents refuse to shake hands with her.

Other possible champions include American Coco Gauff and Iga Swiatek from Poland who won at Flushing Meadows in 2024 and 2022 respectively.  Number two seed Elena Rybakina from Kazakhstan beat Sabalenka in Melbourne earlier this year to capture the Australian grand slam, her second. Also in the frame are third seed American Jessica Pegula, nineteen year old Russian Mirra Andreeva and Linda Noskova from Czechia who is seeded sixth.

A wild card who may surprise is American Emma Navarro. She is only the 26th seed but has now qualified for the quarter finals.

Finals time

After a week of getting through the first three rounds –- the first round alone had 128 matches, the serious finals play is about to start with the last games currently being played to qualify for the quarter-finals. 

The finals take place at the weekend and spectators can expect quality matches as the best players battle to get through to the last two. The legends may have gone but there are still plenty of quality players left, many of them Americans, in the mix.

does Big Pharma create pandemics so it can sell the ‘cures’?

We now know that happened with Covid.