Parliament is in recess for two weeks so your property is safe, notwithstanding ram raids. ACT is embarking on a two week tour to hear the real New Zealand. Please check out when the ACT crew will be touring near you.

Identity tests are always wrong

Watching New Zealand respond to Labour showing us their true colours, Kelvin Davis has actually done us a favour. We believe all Labour MPs think he’s right. They are bright enough not to say it out loud, but Kelvin, well how should we put this? Kelvin ain’t in Parliament because he got bored working at NASA. Let’s just leave it at that.

Since he said Karen Chhour is ‘living in a pakeha world’ and she’s ‘no good looking at the world through a vanilla lens,’ one thing has become clearer than ever: A person should never need to pass an identity test to do their job.

Here’s another thing that’s become clear, Labour’s culture is sick, and it’s because of their philosophy that a person’s identity can matter more than their actions.

Kelvin Davis took a day to apologise, and the Prime Minister did not demand that he do so. Labour waited for the public backlash before apologising because it did not believe Davis had done anything wrong. The idea that your identity can be a qualification is central to Labour policy.

When Davis made his statement, Karen was questioning him about Oranga Tamariki. His Government introduced Section 7AA to that bill, a section that has led to children being removed from safe, nurturing foster homes in favour of homes with Māori ancestry.

This assumption of Māori knowledge is littered throughout Labour policy. The Plant Variety Rights Bill introduces a Māori Plant Varieties Committee. It can block plant varieties being registered and the bill says ‘A person must not be appointed as a member of the committee unless, in the opinion of the Commissioner, the person is qualified for appointment, having regard to that person’s knowledge of mātauranga Māori…’The new resource management laws have five objectives, one of which is to ‘provide greater recognition of te ao Māori including mātauranga Māori.’ Getting a resource consent will depend more and more on whether someone deemed to have a Māori world view agrees with it.

In the case of water management, ‘Te Mana o te Wai draws on a te ao Māori perspective to recognise the whole-of-system approach to wai, from maunga to moana.’ In other words, there is a special Māori way of thinking about water management, and presumably the Karen Chhours of the world don’t have it.

So it goes on. People offended by Davis’s comments that Karen’s identity disqualifies her from her job should ask themselves, how many people will find themselves in that position under Labour’s policies?ACT has a different view, and it’s why we have members like Karen. We believe in universal human rights. We believe that humanity is united by similarities far more important that superficial differences. We believe in a modern, multi-ethnic liberal democracy with a place for all, and discrimination based on identity is wrong.

We won’t cease from mental fight until we have restored real equality of rights and dignity for every human in New Zealand’s green and pleasant land. We are looking forward to releasing our next policy paper that will set out in detail how the next Government will do just that.