by Guy Hatchard
Baby Will: I am not sure how much more I can add to the debate about the case of baby Will except to say that the situation has turned nasty.
Here are two sincere parents who have already been traumatised by the heart condition of their four month old which necessitates an operation. They would like unvaccinated blood to be used, and they arranged for matching donors.
But the surgeon and the New Zealand health system have refused this easy option. Instead, they decided to go for the jugular. They are seeking custody of the child to enforce the use of blood from the public blood bank. They are refusing to admit that studies finding persistence of spike protein indicate any risk. An extreme position. It is of note, as we have previously written that even pro-‘vaccine’ advocates overseas are admitting the existence of novel blood clots, (while arguing implausibly that their causes are unknown).
For two years now, ‘vaccine’ advocates have been asking for separation between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Expressing a deep (yet unfounded) fear of the unvaccinated. Even seeking to avoid breathing the same air. This has been encouraged by government publicity. Now they want the unvaccinated to exclusively and compulsorily receive vaccinated blood transfusions.
Both national dailies have decided to demonise the parents [as you would expect of the Jacinda government propagandists —Eds], abandoning all semblance of humane compassion. There can’t be any greater condemnation of the effect of ‘vaccination’. Apparently, it makes people angry and uncaring.
At a time when the parents deserve understanding and support, all semblance of recognition of the provision of medical choice in the New Zealand Bill of Rights has been abandoned. Medical choice is off the table and it is open season for vicious attacks on the ‘unvaccinated’.
The uneducated hysteria involved is frankly frightening. Instead of listening to government inspired rants, read the studies published in international journals. There is a gulf widening between government messaging and the content of covid science journal publishing. mRNA vaccination poses definable and significant risks for health. These are not small. To people keeping up with the science, they are very concerning.
Baby Will has a heart condition. It is admitted by our government that heart inflammation—myopericarditis—is a risk of ‘vaccination’. It is admitted that some studies indicate persistence of spike protein in the blood. So why on earth would the government insist there is no risk? This is further evidence of a bunker mentality and a hint of madness.
Chris Walker said:
I’ve said it before but will do so again:
Either these political, medical & media whores truly beieve the covid-247 narrative or are being slipped a few million bucks behind the scenes to do so. As you have stated their position is being toppled worldwide by the science they said we neeeded to follow. This never was about a bug. Positioning the world for a World Economic Fascists takeover seems to be the masterplan. All the signs are there if you are not too blinded by official bullshit to see them…
cunning5tunt said:
Do all of us that refused the mrna shot need to now refuse treatment by blood transmission? Would it make any difference if we all suddenly told our medical practitioners to add that information to our medical records?
The worlds top criminals just can’t stop being criminals it would seem.
Hayden Redwood said:
Fucken wankers these so called professional, definite knuckle sandwich time for some need a punch in the face.
Nova said:
Anyone in the medical area who advocates for bad blood to be administered should have to shoulder the costs of any concomitant damage to this infant.
The surgeon is a black-hearted misanthrope – I hope your reward is worth it you scumbag. The komodo dragon that passes for the leader is no doubt purring with delight.
I despise the medical profession; they are worse than any yakuza, triad or mafioso.
At some point there will underground hospitals for such situations but people will need money or something to trade.
alicewontbevaccinated said:
If the child dies or is injured by the use of vaccine tainted blood those responsible for denying the use of pureblood must suffer harsh retribution, extra judicial retribution if needs be.