If the CDC were being honest with people, this is the ad that they would be running. Steve Kirsch wants to fund a study that will make it clear to everyone how many people the so-called ‘vaccine’ has killed.

The CDC doesn’t want anyone doing autopsies on people who might have died from the vaccine. The reason is simple: there is no upside. It can only end badly for them.

But I want to know the truth. I’m willing to pay any researcher anywhere in the US to examine the tissue samples of people who have died within 30 days of getting a covid ‘vaccine’. If I can’t find anyone in the US, I’m open to funding anyone anywhere in the world.

It is amazing to me that nobody else is stepping forward to offer funding for this.

If you are a qualified researcher skilled in pathology and are willing to do the study, I’m willing to fund it. Respond here if you are interested in getting funds or helping to fund the study.

Introduction

In the Schwab study, we learned that the vaccine killed at least 14% of the people who died within 20 days of the vaccination.

But they only focused on the most obvious cases. I believe the number is higher than that.

I’d like to find out just how bad it really is by looking at all the tissue samples of those who died within 30 days of vaccination.

The bare minimum death estimate based on the Constantin Schwab study

3.4 million people die a year in the US. So if 75% are ‘vaccinated’ and we look at all deaths over 20 days, that’s 46,575 people.

14% of that is 6,520. So that’s the very minimum estimate of Americans killed by the ‘vaccine’. The actual number is much, much higher.

What is stunning to me is that if an eyedrop kills three people, it is recalled. When a so called ‘vaccine’ (which is a purely optional intervention meant to save lives) kills, at a bare minimum, 6,520 people, we basically look the other way and try to mandate it for everyone and tell people it is “safe and effective.”

I want to estimate the real numbers based on histopathology of people who died within 1 month after ‘vaccination’. We can expand the study from there once we look at the first 30 days.

Summary

Is there any researcher anywhere in the world willing to do this research which is simply an expanded version of the Constantin Schwab study? Respond here.

We suggest that Steve verifies that applicants have not been paid by governments to promote that substance by surreptious methods as happened in Jacindaland in 2021. —Eds