Those who feel like it can read the US State Dept’s propaganda for the pair on its website here. Despite Joe’s war in Ukraine having been a disaster for the US and its NATO puppets they try to put the best spin on it they can so that US taxpayers willingly continue to fund it: an example:

“As we accelerate our efforts to enable Ukraine to stand on its own, it’s crucial that the United States and our partners continue to do our respective parts.  And that’s why the supplemental that’s currently before Congress is so necessary and so urgent.  And there’s a very clear choice before us:  Are we going to ensure that Putin’s aggression against Ukraine remains a failure; or will Putin prove that, as he believes, he can outlast us, he can divide us, he cannot only continue to threaten Ukraine but take that aggression elsewhere, including, potentially to countries in NATO?”

Many hold that, on the contrary, Russia took preemptive measures to defend itself against US/NATO military aggression using their puppet regimes, the most egregious of them being that of the crooks ru(i)ning Ukraine.

What about the Biden/Blinken/Netanyahu war in Gaza?

“We’re also both united on behalf of our countries in support of Israel’s right to do everything it possibly can to ensure that October 7th never happens again.”

There is, of course, major debate over whether their war is actually doing that, and that with only about 40% of Gazans being killed so far being Hamas terrorists and the rest Arab civilians, it is a major recruitment call for anti-US/NATO Islamic militants all across the Middle East — rather like the effect that the Bloody Sunday massacre in Derry, Northern Island (see earlier post) had on IRA recruitment in the early 1970s.

On the US anti-China attitudes:

“We had a chance, as well, to discuss our approach to the People’s Republic of China.  We’re aligned on key challenges that we face in the Indo-Pacific.  That includes ensuring peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, as well as standing up to the PRC for its nonmarket practices.”

That seems to say, “well, we don’t actually want a hot war, but we need a cold war as an excuse for a major presence in the region.”

And on Venezuela versus Guyana:

“Finally, one issue also that we discussed in our meeting is the situation on the border between Venezuela and Guyana.  These borders were settled in 1899.  I see absolutely no case for unilateral action by Venezuela.  It should cease; it is wrong.  And I’m delighted by the announcements that have been made by the U.S. today in that regard, and I hope to be having some telephone calls later on with the president of Guyana and others in the region to try and make sure that this very retrograde step that has been taken does not lead any further.”

That is a pretty clear statement that they side with Guyana against the awful communist Venezuela regime, but are Blinken/Biden/Austin going to send aircraft carriers to the Venezuelan coast like they did off Lebanon to back that up?