Only the most obsessed Leftist/NATOista/Globalist couldn’t fail to be touched by a photo like this showing a little girl whose two legs and right arm have had to be amputated, most likely a result of the ruble of a bomb-hit building falling on her. Who supplied the bomb that did it? We well know the answer: Biden/Blinken on behalf of Raytheon. It’s not stated which country this is in, it could be Lebanon, Syria or Gaza. Ukraine/Russia is also possible but less likely.
Ultimately it doesn’t matter where it is, the results of War are always a tragedy: innocent people are killed and maimed, property destroyed, hopes and dreams are dashed, mental health is wrecked, and life won’t be the same again.
It’s not enough for Blinken, Biden, Starmer, Macron etc. to have provoked wars in at least 6 countries that have caused over 1.2 million deaths to date, they have to steal other countries’ propertyas well.Biden/Blinken have stolen Syrian oil (see earlier), and now they are thieving a sizeable amount of Russia’s money for their gangster friends in Ukraine.
Protesters hold up blood-stained hands showing what they think of this war criminal.
from RT.com
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said that the Group of Seven (G7) [Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States and the European Union] is actively working on finalizing a multi-billion-dollar “loan package” for Ukraine from Russian sovereign assets frozen by the West.
Speaking at a press briefing following the G7 meeting in Italy, Blinken voiced the group’s commitment to ensuring that Kiev has sufficient funds and munitions to continue fighting “effectively” in 2025 or to engage in any potential negotiations with Moscow “from a position of strength.”
“In our support for Ukraine, we are finalizing getting out the door the $50 billion that has been secured on the basis of the Russian sovereign assets that are frozen,” Blinken stated.
The US and its allies froze an estimated $300 billion in assets belonging to the Russian central bank following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. In June, the G7 members pledged a $50 billion loan for Kiev, which will be repaid using Moscow’s money.
The bulk of the frozen funds, around €197 billion ($206 billion), are being held at Euroclear. The Brussels-based clearinghouse has estimated that the impounded Russian assets generated €5.15 billion ($5.4 billion) in interest in the first three quarters of this fiscal year.
“…from the very beginning, these ‘vaccines’ were not vaccines, particularly the ones that ended up after AstraZeneca with all the clots and they were shut down. But the messenger RNA ‘vaccines’ of Pfizer and Moderna have caused unbelievable problems and damage to people, and I don’t think we will ever really be able to get over that!”
“They changed the mechanism of manufacturing between the trial and the roll out to about six billion people. This thing was full of contaminants. It was full of sequences that can actually get into your genome. And my big concern is that a lot of them explain why that couple of years into this epidemic, we still have massive excess deaths, excess deaths in Australia, New Zealand, and everywhere. And a lot of these now are due to cancer….
The red flags are so enormous. Why has the government not banned these vaccines immediately? For a start, COVID doesn’t exist anymore. And if it does, it doesn’t kill anybody anymore. So why are you using vaccines, boosters that we now know increase the rate of cancer and the cancers are appalling, they’re turbo cancers.”
“These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome. And this is one of the reasons we’re seeing this horrendous rise in turbo cancers. I’m terrified what they have done to our children.”
“Now, I cannot believe the MHRA and the TGA and the FDA, the level of incompetence and negligence. And they have to be held. This is Nuremberg trial stuff! They are so awful. Now, we know about the contamination. Your TGA has stood up and said, “oh, we’ve done this little study, that study”, what have you. “But it doesn’t really matter, because they’re safe and effective. They started the mandate that these vaccines were safe and effective”. No, they were never, ever effective. I’ve looked at the first submissions of Pfizer to the FDA. There was no evidence that they were effective whatsoever. It’s basically hope. And they were never, ever safe.
AI image of the self-declared ‘Sole Source of Truth’.
We asked NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science this question. The response:-
In our NZDSOS membership we have 26 persecuted doctors who are under investigation.
Their ‘crimes’ included writing an exemption, writing a prescription for Ivermectin, making a video on informed consent for c-19 injections, having an opinion which differed to the Ministry of Health and more!
One case — Dr Phil Mcdonald was fined $20,000 plus. Others have huge court costs. Some are having to undergo ‘re-education’ to show they are not dissidents. Others have ‘gag’ orders on their certificates not to talk.
Late yesterday afternoon Immigration New Zealand barred Candace Owens from entering New Zealand. It seems (incredibly) the best response New Zealand now has to opinions that some find distasteful or wrong is to exclude them from the conversation entirely.
Like many Kiwis, you may not even know who Candace Owens is.
A conservative commentator from the United States (formerly on the Daily Wire with Ben Shapiro), she has been accused of ‘far-right’ and ‘extremist’ views. For this reason, since she announced her tour of Australia and New Zealand, would-be-censors have been campaigning, like they did with Posie Parker, to have immigration officials block her entry.
They succeeded in having Australian officials do this last month. Now, the same thing has happened here.
A sophisticated country is able to deal with opinions that some find controversial, distasteful, or even dangerous. The most mature way to deal with these views is to challenge and rebut them, not to exclude them from the conversation.
Immigration New Zealand is arguing that section 15 of the Immigration Act requires them to exclude individuals who have been barred from entering New Zealand and who have been barred from entering other countries. “Nothing to see here, our hands are tied” is basically all they can muster.
Firstly, we think they are wrong. Our legal team has started burning the (almost) midnight oil, but we’re actively looking at challenging this decision, on the basis Immigration is acting unlawfully. (I’ll spare you the legal details, but it comes down to the technical definitions of ‘excluded).
Secondly, even if she was ‘excluded’, why on earth should we have law that automatically means we then barre others entry. Should we shut out Salman Rushdie because the Iranians don’t like him?
Every year hundreds, if not thousands of less well-known people who have been denied entry to Australia have been allowed to visit NZ.
This action by Immigration NZ is a smokescreen.
Public calls by Young Labour over the past few months to exclude Owens from NZ shores is the more likely reason for the action. Anyone who’s been following this story knows this.
But who at Immigration NZ would be willing to risk admitting that their refusal is based on Owens’ controversial opinions, right?
It’s easier for officials to fudge their reading of the legislation than to admit they’re vetting a person for expressing personal beliefs which, though highly controversial, are still permitted under section 14 of the NZ Bill of Rights Act.
But we know censorship has a nasty way of boomeranging back on censors.
Mark my words: Candace Owens will come to New Zealand eventually to hold public events. And when she does, many more people will attend than otherwise would have, as a result of these attempts to shut her out.
Here’s what we’ve done (in the past 2 hours):
1. We’ve written to the Ministers of Immigration (Erica Stanford is the Minister of Immigration, but Chris Penk, as the Associate Minister, is actually responsible for these decisions).
We’re calling on the Government to exercise discretion and allow Owens entry.
2. Our legal team is working to challenge this decision. In our minds, this isn’t about Candace Owens herself. It’s about the principle, that the Government blocking individuals from speaking in New Zealand because we dislike their opinions is a dangerous road.
3. We’ve contacted media: while some Kiwis will think it’s a ‘victory’ that Owens has been excluded, I’m confident that New Zealanders around the country are big enough to deal with others’ perspectives, whether they agree or not.
We need to ensure the public is aware of this decision and the Government is held accountable.
4. That’s where you come in! We need your help to put pressure on the Government.
Chris Penk (Chris.Penk@parliament.govt.nz), is the Associate Minister of Immigration who has the authority to use his discretion to allow Candace Owens is. Seeing as there is no legitimate argument to exclude her (other than ‘the Australians did’ — what, are we an Australian State now? :-), he should grant her entry. An e-mail from you, saying exactly that, will help get his attention.
