In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely
positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. What were his reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.
John C Smith said:
Watch https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/ Ivermectin: Friend or Foe by Steve Falconer. Who is he? From same bitchute page locate his very recent conversation with our very own (suggest you own their advice) real doctors Samantha and Mark Bailey of Christchurch.
Sorry, but whatever Dr? Andrew Hill does now will not bring back the millions of people who have died or been injured by the so called vaccine. It begs the questions, how much was he pressured, by whom and what did he get out of it. How will he live with the shame of what he has done?
Waikanae watchers said:
Simple question: who’s been getting rich from the Jabs? “Follow the money”