The life of Kayla Pollock, a 37-year-old mother from Ontario, took a dramatic turn after she received a booster shot of the Moderna covid ‘vaccine’. She became paralyzed from the neck down.
Kayla had a terrible childhood. As a child, she was severely abused by her parents, reports Uncutnews.
During Corona, the media, politicians and health authorities called for vaccination. Kayla received two Pfizer vaccinations in 2021 and needed to be vaccinated to visit her father.
Kayla also opted for a booster vaccination. She was vaccinated on January 11, 2022 and four days later her legs suddenly gave out. Nine days later it happened again.
When she woke up on February 22, 2022, she could no longer move her body. At the hospital, the doctor told her she was imagining everything and was crazy.
However, an MRI scan showed that her spinal cord was damaged. A neurologist prescribed her steroids, which allowed her to regain some movement of her arms, hands and fingers. In a conversation recorded by her boyfriend, the neurologist said he believed her condition was “caused by the vaccine.”
When asked if there were more people who had experienced this, the neurologist replied: “Many people have.”
Kayla later discovered that she suffered from transverse myelitis, an acute inflammation of the spinal cord. This is a known side effect of the Covid-19 vaccine.
She spent months in the hospital, where she says she was offered euthanasia twice, but refused.
Kayla now takes a lot of medication every day and has lost everything. Every morning someone has to get her out of bed and every evening her feces have to be removed by hand and she has to be put back to bed.
She turned to the Canadian government’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). After a year, she was told that her application had never been received. She recently reapplied.
According to reports in the MSM the Warner-Discovery owned TV3 will cease its news and current affairs broadcasts at the end of June, a move that doesn’t surprise anyone, given the losses these programs generate now for the owners.
It’s both good news and not-so-good news: although, like TV1 News, Newshub has basically functioned as a propaganda arm of the Labour Party for the last 6 years, it did from time to time take the Jacinda government to task over one of its constant untruths, something which TV1 never did. It also presented (non-controversial) items that TV1 didn’t cover.
Maybe if Newshub had set out to challenge rather than parrot Leftist propaganda, it may have generated loyal viewers from National/ACT/NZ First voters who are now the majority, but it’s too late now,
It means that the battle for audiences will intensify on web-based social media.
NATO countries are warning that NATO troops could be heading to Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron said that this possibility “could not be ruled out.”
But Ukraine is not a member of NATO so why would NATO do this?
“We will do everything needed so Russia cannot win the war,” Macron said.
This comes as Sweden received its final approval to join NATO. One has to wonder how the Swedish people feel about joining an alliance that is on the brink of war when they were not previously on the brink of war. Congratulations?
Michael von der Schulenburg, former UN Assistant Secretary-General, wrote recently that the West is already in breach of the UN Charter of its military support of Ukraine by not supporting peace deals. The same could be said of the West’s refusal to enforce peace agreements in Israel. Do these rules mean anything if no one is willing to abide by them?
This shows that NATO simply exists as an aggressive Imperial alliance — heavily subsidized by the U.S. — to preserve the American Empire. Donald Trump stated while President it was time the U.S. ended that massive subsidy, and has repeatedly said Joe’s war must end. —Eds
The U.K. has reclassified Disney’s 1964 movie Mary Poppins from a U rating (universal) to a PG because of “discriminatory language.” In the film, Admiral Boom uses the word “Hottentots” not once but twice. This was a derogatory word that Europeans once used for South African nomadic groups. The U.K. is really tackling the most important issues facing civilization.
That’s the summation of Winston Peters regarding revelations that senior editorial figures discussed withholding coverage of the Deputy PM’s criticisms of the media.
The revelations came from the co-editor of Newsroom, Mark Jennings, in an RNZ podcast. Jennings admitted to “quite a lot of talk in the media – particularly among senior editorial people” to silence Peters due to disagreement with his views.
“It is a glimpse behind the curtain with this astonishing admission that exposes the deep-seated planning and narrative of some ‘senior editorial people’ in the media,” Peters wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter).
Such collusion contradicts the fundamental role of the media as unbiased watchdogs and signals trouble for democracy, he said.
For his part, Jennings tried to downplay his comments in a reply to Peters on X.
Dr Lily Nightingale highlights a crucial issue thrown up by the Ministry of Health (MOH) pursuing the messenger (Barry Young), instead of listening to his message about excess deaths within the MOH data, which he brought to light in order to help the people of New Zealand.
In Lily’s words:
When the Pfizer document, that Pfizer had sought to keep buried for 75 years, was released, I noted that it listed nine pages of side-effects.
Given the “safe and effective” mantra, day in and day out, I was curious to know what [the Jacinda government]/MOH knew — and when they knew it.
On 9 March 2022, I submitted an OIA (Official Information Act) Request as follows:
“Please see attached. Page 30 onwards highlights 9 pages of adverse events to Pfizer’s covid vaccine.
1) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before recommending ANY vaccination in this country?
2) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before recommending mass roll out?
3) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before mandating certain job types?
4) Were you aware of ANY of these side effects before opening vaccination for 5-11 year olds?
5) When were you aware of SOME of these side effects?
6) When were you aware of MANY of these side effects?
7) When were you aware of ALL of these side effects?
On 15 March 2022, I was advised that this information was already in the public domain and that there were “various OIA’s” I could look at, to find what I was looking for.
Of course, they wouldn’t tell me specifically in which OIA I would be able to locate the information. Instead, I had to spend many hours researching all the various documents, and searching for the answers.
I eventually found it in an OIA which had been published on 12 January 2022.
It confirmed that the New Zealand Labour Government and the Ministry of Health both knew all of the side-effects before the granting of approval by Medsafe (limited use, therefore not permitted for national roll-out).
This crucial piece of the jigsaw puzzle confirms that the Labour Government under Jacinda Ardern and the Ministry of Health headed by Director-General Ashley Bloomfield both knew all of the side-effects before the first covid ‘vaccine’ was given out in New Zealand.
I was in shock!
How could something with nine pages of side-effects, ever be called “safe and effective”?
We were lied to, daily, by Ardern and Bloomfield.
The Labour Government was not “the single source of truth”.
Instead it was a cesspit which offered, through endlessly repeated propaganda and lies, a sinister indoctrination of all those Kiwis who were too-trusting of the glib and deeply insincere assurances from Ardern and Bloomfield.
Our short interview with Dr Nightingale is now being shared widely on Twitter:
What should be the outcome of Dr Lily’s important disclosure here?
During a discussion with Maria Zeee of Zeee Media, about the MOAR data from brave Whistleblower Barry Young, Liz Gunn gives examples from the anonymised data, which offer evidence that would justify manslaughter and quite probably, murder charges against Jacinda Ardern.
Jim Ferguson also picked up on this same theme in an important tweet in December 2023 which is now heading towards a million views.
In Jim’s words:
Firstly, from an ethical standpoint, leaders bear a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of their citizens. Implementing the Covid mandates with knowledge of its potential risks, without transparent communication or consent, violates this fundamental duty. If allegations are true, it’s imperative that Ardern faces these accusations and provides explanations for their decisions. Avoiding such scrutiny by fleeing abroad undermines the trust placed in them by the electorate.
Legally, every individual, including national leaders, must adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. If evidence suggests that a leader knowingly risked public health, they should be subject to legal processes to determine the extent of their liability. Fleeing to avoid such processes is not only a dereliction of duty but also a circumvention of the legal system that they once pledged to uphold.
Morally, the act of fleeing in the face of a crisis is a betrayal of the leader’s commitment to their nation. Leadership demands facing the consequences of one’s actions, especially when those actions have potentially endangered lives. It is a question of moral integrity and the courage to stand by one’s decisions, however consequential they may be.
Barry Young is the heroic Kiwi whistleblower who saw the clear evidence of excess deaths from the Covid jab rollout, while building a pay-per-dose database on behalf of the Ministry of Health in New Zealand.
The data is fully anonymised, so it threatens to expose no person’s private information.
The data shows the kill rates from the jab in different towns in New Zealand. This information should be openly given to the People because it is their data.
Instead, the Ministry of Health are putting Barry Young on trial for sharing the shocking truths about excess deaths from the jab rollout. It appears that they are willing to hide this data from the People.
Why would the Ministry of Health persecute someone for telling the truth, when that person – Barry – is losing so much (including his job) by doing this, while gaining zero personal advantage?
Is this not the very essence of a scenario in which an honourable Whistleblower should be not only protected, but also praised for doing the right thing?
Can the MOH truly say they are doing the ‘right thing’ by the now – thousands of Kiwis who have been injured, and killed, by this Pfizer poison?
It is now up to The People of New Zealand to demand the MOH Release The Data so that we can decide for ourselves what is the truth, and who is lying. [Fat chance, they’re still loyal to Comrade Jacinda. —Eds]
