But Nato doesn’t give a Stuff about Ukrainians — they are totally expendable.
🎙 Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to questions during the Ambassadorial Roundtable discussion “Ukraine Crisis: The West’s True Goals and Role” (Moscow, June 23, 2026)
Saturday 18 July 2026 1.30pm – 3.30pm Waikanae Beach Community Hall, 22 Rauparaha Street, Waikanae Beach
They will be covering a number of important local issues, including flooding and stormwater management, drainage, housing intensification, community hall matters, vehicle management, tree management and more.
There is also an important Kapiti Coast Council feedback page here:
Please take a few minutes to complete it. We have already seen what happens when local councils and local communities lose influence to central government decision-making. Local voices matter, and these feedback forms are one of the ways we can make sure Waikanae’s needs and concerns are heard.
On behalf of the Committee Waikanae Garden Precinct Protection Society
A sign in the town of Cassis on the Mediterrean coast about 15 km east of Marseille, but it also applies in the city of Narbonne, see here. In Kapiti it would never get hot enough to want to! You wonder if this intended to not excite the predominately male Muslim migrants who constantly show up.
A track into the Tararua range above Otaki Forks (WellingtonNZ pic)
Kiwi mum creates map to show conservation land at risk
After learning through a Forest & Bird newsletter that the Government was proposing significant changes to the Conservation Act, Wellington mother, tramper, and lifelong nature lover Kerren Corbett found herself unable to sleep. The next morning, she put on her boots and went tramping.
Hiking through the Tararua Forest Park, ideas flooded in. One — an interactive map that — like Forest and Bird’s — shows the large areas of conservation land affected, but also which MPs represent them and how they’ve voted on the environment. A play on words, she called the website mylocalmatters.org. It’s designed to help New Zealanders understand the scale of the proposed changes and what’s happening to their local scenic reserve or park. The website also makes it easy to take action by sending a letter to their MP or a submission. It is an election year after all.
But for Corbett, the issue goes beyond politics.
“In the Tararua I talked to people I met along the way. No one knew about the proposed changes. We talked about local huts, trails, rivers. These places aren’t just lines on a map. They are full of our memories, adventures, a place of fun but also a sanctuary. When I realised places like ‘my local’ could be affected by these changes, I knew more people needed to know what was happening.”
The proposed legislation would make approximately 60% of New Zealand’s conservation land eligible for disposal, sale, exchange, or long-term commercial leasing. It would also introduce a new requirement for the Department of Conservation to enable economic development on conservation land to the greatest extent practicable, while reducing independent oversight and public participation in decision-making.
During her recent Tararua trip, Corbett met two brothers in their seventies who had grown up exploring the Ranges. When discussing the proposed changes, one suggested that extracting minerals might be necessary for economic growth. The conversation prompted Corbett to look deeper into the economic arguments often used to justify development on conservation land.
Research by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research estimates conservation land contributes approximately $15.5 billion annually to New Zealand’s economy directly through tourism and recreation, but also indirectly through ecological services like water and soil protection. By comparison, government analysis suggests a major mining operation may generate around $100 million annually for a limited period, with most profits flowing offshore.
But Corbett says the debate is about more than economics, “This isn’t just about dollars and cents. It’s about who gets to decide the future of places that benefit all of us. Conservation land is held in trust for New Zealanders. These forests, rivers, mountains, wetlands and coastlines support wildlife, protect our water, help tackle climate change, and give us places to walk, camp, hunt, fish and connect with nature. Once they’re sold, leased, mined or developed, there is no guarantee we’ll ever get them back and in what state they’ll be in.”
The campaign highlights concerns raised by conservation organisations, recreation groups, Iwi, environmental advocates and outdoor communities about the proposed reforms, including the concentration of decision-making powers in a single politician, reduced opportunities for public input, and the weakening of independent conservation oversight.
Corbett hopes the map she’s created will help New Zealanders visualise the potential impacts and encourage them to write to their MPs and take part in the submission process.
“As New Zealanders, it’s normal we have different perspectives. But conservation land is one of the few things that brings us together regardless of who we are and where we come from. These places are part of us. We owe it to the generations who protected them before us and to those who come after us to speak up now.”
Public submissions on the proposed legislation close on 2 July.
New Zealanders can learn more, explore the map, send a letter to your MP and make a submission at mylocalmatters.org.
UPDATE
We have received this e-mail today:-
Kia ora
New Zealanders care deeply about conservation — so does National and so do I. We know how important our pristine landscapes, national parks, marine reserves, and wilderness areas are to New Zealanders. But we were not clear enough about how the Conservation Amendment Bill improves outcomes for conservation — so we are fixing it.
We have listened and heard the clear concerns about the proposed amendments for disposal or exchange of conservation land — so I am removing those provisions from the bill. This remains the most significant reform of conservation legislation in nearly 40 years, and it will improve the conservation system for all New Zealanders.
National has listened and we have taken action. We are going to work hard to get this critical bill right.
The sad thing is that, unlike in America, we have no ‘mainstream’ politicians who have set out to expose this sort of corruption.
In November 2025, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research identified 10 child deaths related to the covid-19 shots. In December 2025, the agency reduced the number to seven after revising at least two of the children’s autopsies, according to documents released last week by Sen. Ron Johnson.
Scientists at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised the autopsy results of children who died after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, reducing the number of children the agency classified as having likely died as a result of their vaccination, according to documents released last week by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.).
The documents show that in November 2025, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) identified 10 child deaths related to the COVID-19 shots. But in December 2025, it reduced the number to seven and downgraded the probability that those deaths were connected to the children’s vaccination.
The Daily Caller, which first reported, quoted two former FDA officials and a forensic pathologist who performed two of the children’s autopsies. One of the FDA officials told the outlet the emails reveal “a coverup” by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Johnson included the documents in a letter sent last week to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CDC Acting Director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Acting Commissioner Kyle Diamantas.
Even the reduced number of deaths was enough to trigger concern among some FDA scientists about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, Johnson’s letter stated.
“Although what drove the decision to change these three cases remains to be seen, what is clear is that these officials appear to have determined that the seven cases warranted warning about the risks,” Johnson wrote. These risks “should have raised serious concerns at HHS and CDC about the mRNA COVID-19 Injections.”
Even after the downgrade, the FDA’s Division of Pharmacovigilance recommended revising the label of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to include a warning about the risk of “myocarditis with fatal outcomes.”
The change was never made, for reasons that are not clear.
According to the Daily Caller, the children’s deaths occurred in 2021 and 2022, but were not revealed until 2025.
One of the unnamed FDA officials who spoke to the outlet said, “One wonders if there was internal pressure at the FDA during that time not to report these pediatric deaths in a timely manner.”
Attorney Greg Glaser said the FDA’s “maneuvering to obscure the true devastation of these vaccines is the definition of a fraudulent act” to protect Big Pharma.
Johnson is asking the CDC to provide him with all records relating to its decision to award Pfizer new contracts for its COVID-19 shots, and all CDC and FDA records about child deaths related to COVID-19 vaccination and any deliberations that occurred over whether to change the labels of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the number of child deaths linked to the COVID-19 shots is likely much higher, citing reports from the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). He said:
“VAERS reports (for U.S. only) show 84 child deaths (17 and under) from the COVID shot. We know that because of the gross underreporting of VAERS and the consistent efforts by the medical profession to mask vaccine deaths, 84 child deaths are only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to mortality associated with the COVID shot.
“In light of this, it seems ridiculous to quibble over the HHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] trying to reduce the number of deaths from 10 to 7. However, it belies the fact that when it comes to vaccines, the deep state within HHS, past and present, will lie through their teeth about a death or injury related to vaccines.”
Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., said the deaths are the outcome of a government cover-up of the “reckless” gain-of-function research “that caused COVID” and “killed 20 million and cost $25 trillion.”
HHS did not respond to The Defender’s request for comment by press time.
FDA officials who studied child deaths linked to COVID shots later ousted
The Daily Caller published a Dec. 5, 2025, email by Dr. Meghna Alimchandani, deputy director of the FDA Division of Pharmacovigilance, to then-CBER Director Vinay Prasad, informing him of the downgrade from 10 to seven deaths.
Of the seven deaths, two were deemed “probable” and five were classified as “possible.” Five of the seven deaths involved myocarditis, with two of those considered “probable” and three “possible.” That email also contained the recommendation to change the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine labels.
A week earlier, on Nov. 28, 2025, Prasad sent a memo to CBER staff informing them that he had evidence that “at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination.” In that memo, Prasad linked those children’s deaths to the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
“For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children. Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death,” Prasad wrote.
According to the Daily Caller, the memo leaked to the press “within hours,” resulting in “a media firestorm.” In her email to Prasad, Alimchandani wrote that the FDA’s review of the children’s deaths was a “MONUMENTAL effort … while being bombarded with media articles on the subject.”
Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., who at the time was acting director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and who was investigating VAERS reports of children who died after receiving a COVID-19 shot, noted that Prasad’s memo contained indications that a cover-up was underway. The memo stated:
“Dr. Hoeg organized a small meeting to discuss these deaths with OVRR [Office of Vaccines Research and Review] … stakeholders. The slides she presented, emails she sent, and distorted firsthand reports was shared with media outlets. The general narrative was that OVRR staff disagreed with Dr. Hoeg’s assessment that the deaths were due to vaccine receipt.
“Some staff present who leaked portrayed the incident as Dr. Hoeg attempting to create a false fear regarding vaccines.”
Høeg had previously authored a report recommending that the number of diseases sccovered by the childhood vaccination schedule be reduced from 17 to 11.
Writing on Substack, Høeg questioned whether “any of these 10 cases have come to light if I had not given that presentation and Vinay had not asked for a ‘detailed analysis’ of the cases” or if Johnson “had not pursued getting the information.”
Claims children died due to parvovirus a ‘red herring’
The documents Johnson released show that two of the deaths were downgraded in part because of the presence of parvovirus B19 — a commonly occurring virus that causes mild symptoms in most people.
But in remarks shared with the Daily Caller, Dr. James Gill, a Yale School of Medicine pathologist who conducted the autopsies of two of the children who died postvaccination and published his findings in 2022, said the FDA and CDC’s parvovirus explanation is a “red herring.”
“Essentially, they could exclude about half of the potential complications because of this finding,” Gill said. He noted that parvovirus is found in the tissues of approximately half the population.
Gill said that while parvovirus infection can lead to heart problems, it would result in a different pattern of injury than what he observed in the two children. In his 2022 paper, Gill noted that the two children demonstrated symptoms of atypical myocarditis instead of “the alterations seen with typical myocarditis.”
Gill’s published study of the two cases “provoked an urgent rebuttal from the FDA and CDC,” the Daily Caller reported, citing documents the Epoch Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The FDA documents Johnson released confirmed that the cases were downgraded in part due to the presence of parvovirus.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for CHD, said the CDC “muddied the waters” and “deliberately obscured” the evidence. Jablonowski referred to his analysis of the VAERS reports of two of the seven children listed in the documents Johnson released, noting that the FDA and CDC reached different conclusions.
One of the children, 16-year-old Micah Williamson, died a few days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot. His death certificate attributed his death to “stress cardiomyopathy” related to his vaccination, and his VAERS report indicated myocarditis.
Yet, “The CDC claimed the presence of parvovirus B19 made the myocarditis of viral origins and not the vaccine,” Jablonowski said.
The FDA classified Williamson’s death as “possibly related to COVID-19 vaccination,” noting that “parvovirus B19 likely has long-term persistence in heart tissues and is frequently detected in heart tissues from autopsies of patients with no clinical or histopathologic evidence of myocarditis.”
This updated report was deleted in May 2025, Jablonowski said. Yet, “the CDC found a bacterial growth, and overstepping its purview, concluded that the death was attributable to C. septicum sepsis.”
The FDA overruled the CDC, finding that COVID-19 vaccination was the “probable” cause of Clynick’s death.
Jablonowski said Clynick received a vaccine from Pfizer lot number EW0217, “which consisted of 2,857,140 doses and resulted in 28 deaths reported to VAERS.”
“VAERS captures the smallest sliver of actual adverse events. Jacob and Micah represent the smallest sliver of actual adverse events from a time when every living generation jeopardized their heart health with an unsafe vaccine,” Jablonowski said.
Gill said he “tried to engage” the FDA in a dialogue, but “they shut it down.”
‘We must move immediately from investigation to indictment’
Experts said the cover-up warrants legal and regulatory action, especially in light of the FDA’s likely forthcoming approval of an mRNA flu vaccine and the liability shield COVID-19 vaccine makers continue to enjoy under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).
“With the approval of the mRNA flu jab, the carnage will continue, and federal officials will ‘smile and wave’ as they knowingly send precious children to their demise,” Hooker said.
“We most definitely should be talking about subpoenas, arrests and prosecutions,” Ebright said. “We also most definitely should be talking about debarment and clawbacks of federal pensions and benefits.”
Glaser agreed. “We must move immediately from investigation to indictment. The era of polite ‘oversight hearings’ is over. We need the full force of subpoena power followed by grand jury proceedings.”
“There is no need to debate seven versus 10,” said former pharmaceutical research and development executive Sasha Latypova. “The mRNA shots killed hundreds and possibly thousands of children. … However, even seven acknowledged children’s deaths are sufficient to remove the product from the market immediately.”
It’s that time of year in the northern hemisphere when the Climate Cult starts proclaiming that we haven’t appeased the weather gods enough and must make more sacrifices to them.
Now, temperatures over 35C or 95F start to become unpleasant unless there’s a nice breeze, and 40C is just oppressive — you want stay in an air-conditioned space — but 30C is great; if only we had that every day in Waikanae!
