Posted by Waikanae watchers | Filed under Uncategorized
patio near the estuary
15 Saturday Dec 2018
15 Saturday Dec 2018
14 Friday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

Fingers crossed for fine weather.
14 Friday Dec 2018
13 Thursday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized
13 Thursday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

News that the Auditor-General, Greg Schollum is expressing concern regarding Kapiti Coast District Council’s borrowing-for-investments plan comes as no surprise to Guy Burns, Deputy Chair of the Raumati Paraparaumu Community Board.
“The Mayor’s current change of direction, in not supporting the plan, seems to put him at loggerheads with some of his Councillors who have been outspoken enthusiasts of the risky scheme. I hope they follow the Mayor and change their minds,” he says.
“The Auditor-General calls the plan ‘unusual’. It is highly unusual, risky and unacceptable. The plan is flawed and has been met with disbelief by many ratepayers. Using loans to invest is counter-intuitive to most Kiwis and goes against what ratepayers find acceptable.
“I call on Councillors to reverse their decision to establish a borrowing-for-investment scheme.”
12 Wednesday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

As is obvious from this photo taken this afternoon, the existing footpath and most of the grass berm, and the trees on it, are being removed along the south side of Ngaio Road — to be replaced with a wide strip of concrete.
The objective it seems is to create a “shared path” for both pedestrians and cyclists.
The council says it sent residents in the street a “consultation letter outlining the pros and cons of a number of possible options” and that “the responses received from residents informed [its] preferred option, which [it is] now building.”
Although we’ve not seen the letter, we doubt one of the options was “leave things like they are.”
12 Wednesday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

Putting the Battle of Gate Pa in context
by Roger Childs
It (Gate Pa) was one of the big ones. –Cliff Simmons
The Battles of Gate Pa and Te Ranga were late contests, followed by a peace that deserves a more prominent place in our memories. —John McLean and John Robinson
Next year is the 155th anniversary of the Battle of Gate Pa near Tauranga. Was it a significant battle, part of a series of engagements, or just a minor contest, ending in defeat for the Maori participants? Opinions differ. Waikanae historian, John Robinson and Tross Publisher and historian John Mclean decided to set the record straight and head off another planned book on the topic.
Their book Gate Pa and Te Ranga: The Full Story came out two months before Victory at Gate Pa? by Buddy Mikaere and Cliff Simmons. Many historians over recent decades, both Maori and non-Maori, have been anxious to find victories by the indigenous people over the Crown forces in the 19thcentury. For a number of writers, Gate Pa was one of the great successes. However, it wasn’t a clear-cut Maori victory.
Certainly the defenders of Gate Pa did repel an attack by government forces, but the latter held their ground and captured the pa the following day after the Ngaiterangi had abandoned it overnight. Is this the way victors in battle behave – give up their fortified positions and withdraw?
Essentially Gate Pa saw a brave showing by the defending Maori in repelling a poorly managed assault on a well constructed pa, but the claims of a victory cannot be substantiated. In fact Gate Pa was one of a series of engagements involving the Ngaiterangi and their allies who supported the rebel kingites, against government forces and friendly Maori forces (kupapa.) Ultimately it ended two months later in a decisive victory for crown forces at Te Ranga.
In an interview in November 2017, Buddy Mikaere made clear what the approach to Victory at Gate Pa? would be. He spoke of an “invasion” of the Tauranga area by government forces and went on to say … the machinations of settler land greed and colonial politics and confidently riding on the back of relatively easy victories in the Waikato fighting, they [the colonial government] thought this was the way to go.
The two Johns put the lie to these claims in their highly readable, thoroughly researched and well constructed analysis of the background to the fighting; what happened before and after Gate Pa; and the significance of the lasting peace that followed.
They provide detail on the 18 battles from 1820 to 1840 fought between local tribes in the Bay of Plenty area. Most involved the Ngaiterangi. There is also background on the kingite rebellion and how some East Coast / Bay of Plenty Maori, like the Ngaiterangi, supported the rebels. Warriors from these tribes arrived by canoe at Otaramakau in April 1864.
There followed a series of engagements – Tarua, Maketu, GatePa and Te Ranga. The authors correctly put Gate Pa in the context of one of a number of contests at the time. They emphasize that the outcome was ultimately positive for all concerned. Reconciliation and forgiveness were the way ahead for all – former rebels, friendlies and settlers.
This is an excellent account of what really happened, told concisely. It also provides very useful Appendices on what key figures said at the time and lists of the casualties on both sides. There is also a useful chapter entitled Correcting some myths, and the book includes a number of appropriate maps, sketches and other illustrations. Some of the maps could have been larger.
Thoroughly recommended.
Gate Pa and Te Ranga: The Full Story by John McLean and John Robinson:
169 pages including 16 pages of maps/photos in A5 format, softcover. (Available from Paper Plus for $30 or can be ordered off the Tross Publishing website.)
12 Wednesday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

Above is the response we received today asking what policy it has. The short answer is that there is a staff Code of Conduct, but no policy about commenting on social media — however, one is coming.
There has been a lot of suspicion about whether those defending council decisions and actions (on Facebook particularly) are council staff members or in their immediate families.
12 Wednesday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

12 Wednesday Dec 2018
Posted in Uncategorized

“Professor of public health of the University of California Berkeley, Dr. Joel Moscowitz says that MM W’s could pose a very real danger. He told the Daily Mail Online that the deployment of 5G cellular technology is a massive experiment on all health of all species.
This is extremely frightening and should be of high concern to the public. The laundry list of medical issues in every single category is simply, unbelievable.”
From prepforthat.com
You want fast wireless service. Enhanced wireless data speeds are premium services that stand to make Wireless companies billions (and already do). The newest technological enhancement to improved wireless data speeds is 5G. The installation of 5G cell towers is not only going to improve speed, but it is also likely to have a detrimental effect on our public health. Wireless companies have already installed up to 300,000 new 5G antennas.
That’s right, 5G is coming whether we like it or not and health risks are going to tag along with these faster data experiences.
And the 5G health risks war is already making its face known. Local citizens are writing their lawmakers to express their concerns over 5G cell towers. 5G tower waves are being linked to cancer, immune system compromises, and numerous other health issues.
5G is a new technology that offers an infinite data broadcast capability and has an unrestricted calling. The technology uses an untapped bandwidth and is known as MMW. It is between 30 GHz and 300 GHz.
5G, like its predecessors 3G and 4G, allow us to stay connected virtually anywhere. That connectivity between us and our online ventures is constantly challenged by more and more people coming online as well as more modern, capable devices.