by Steve Kirsch

We couldn’t get a clear signal from the quantitative data (yet), but the comments… well, they are a crystal-clear signal that we have a vaccine which needs to be stopped immediately.

Nearly everyone was unvaccinated in the first month which is why the unvaccinated had a higher rate of death than the vaccinated. But it was the comments on the survey that were impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe.

About 24 hours ago, I launched an all-cause mortality survey.

My fellow “misinformation spreaders” were skeptical I’d find a signal because the survey is death reports only. I was confident I would find something really big.

It turns out that we were both right!

We now have nearly 2,000 responses to my all-cause mortality survey and have looked at the data for various signals, but so far, it’s pretty tough due to a variety of issues (reporter bias, selective recall, biased sample set, etc). Basically, with only 2,000 responses, you get a lot of statistical noise which can easily drown out your signal. We have a vaccinated population which is changing over time, a deadly virus coming and going, we have to stratify by age groups, etc. Little signal, lots of noise.

Joel Smalley looked at the data with me and his first impression was that at best, the vaccine was completely useless for saving lives. But he wanted more time to give a more definitive analysis. I will update this as I learn more.

So my friends were right on that part.

Here’s part of the Pivot table where if you view the unvaccinated column, you can see the numbers just jump around too much. It should be smoothly going down in 2021 and then stabilizing to be flat since the unvaccinated have remained relatively stable in 2022.

Even with all the noise, you can still see that the deaths in the vaccinated group appear to be higher right after vaccination happens which cannot happen if the vaccine is safe: in the ideal case it will be perfectly flat. So we’d expect the first column (unvaccinated) to fall in 2021 then remain stable. For the other columns, we’d expect the number of deaths every month to remain fairly stable (perhaps fluctuating a little on Delta).

There are many other ways to analyze this data. For example, someone could look at the deaths by age in a given month and compare that to the “normal” shape of that curve (i.e., few deaths in the younger ages, more deaths in the older groups). If after the rollout to younger people, the relative death rates for younger adults are relatively higher than the baseline, that would be very troubling for the pro-narrative folks.

You can import into Airtable, excel, etc. and do your own pivot table analysis.

Note: I’ve marked many (but not all) rows which are obviously data integrity issues in a special column. I filter them out in Airtable. Your view has these included so you can see I didn’t cheat.

The Notes field

But I hate losing arguments so I thought I’d look at the Notes field. The notes field is in plain sight for anyone to look at.

Notes was an optional field that nobody had to fill out and I almost didn’t include it in the survey because I wanted to show objectively from the data alone, whether the vaccines were safe or not.

To my surprise, the Notes field was mind-blowing

Whoa. Bingo. Jackpot!

The value is in the narrative describing each of the deaths, not in the quantitative columns!

Many of the unvaccinated who died, had hospital assisted deaths (i.e., the “treatment protocols” for COVID).

Most of the vaccinated who died had a vax-related story linking the vaccine with the death.

For example:

My aunt had cancer that was in remission. She then had a very aggressive bout. Her doctor said that it was the most aggressive cancer she had ever seen in her 30 years of practice. I don’t know when, but I do know she had the vaccine, at least one.

Or this one:

My wife’s grandma. Got her second dose and developed “acquired hemophilia” and bled out internally and died. A 1 in a million condition. Oddly, there was another patient in the same hospital in KY with the same “1 in a million” condition.

The most important thing to keep in mind that my request was not if you knew anyone who died from the vaccine. My request was anyone who died from ANY CAUSE whatsoever in 2020 and 2021. I cannot emphasize this enough.

So you are seeing commentary on the cause of ALL deaths, not just “I think it was the vaccine” deaths. If the vaccine is implicated in just 10% of those all-cause death reports, it’s a disaster. If the vaccine is implicated in 76% of the deaths, it’s unthinkable. It’s the single largest killer of people in history. It makes the SARS-CoV-2 virus look like a rounding error.

I looked at the first 25 records with commentary and judged 76% to be vaccine related. I tried to be conservative and only rated it vax related if I felt I could defend my judgment if challenged and win.

But don’t take my word for it. After all, I’m a professional misinformation superspreader. Do your own survey.

Pick 10 comments at random from people who were vaccinated and later died. Read the comments.

You tell me: Does this sound like they died from natural causes?

POLL

Choose at 10 or more comments in the database. For the people who died who were vaccinated, do these sound like normal deaths that were NOT related to the vaccine to you??

Vax implicated in >=50% of deaths

Vax implicated in 25 -50% of deaths

Vax implicated in <25% of deaths

Nothing to see here; move along

357 VOTES · 6 DAYS REMAINING

Bias?

Sure, there could be some bias since these are my followers. But I’d be very surprised if these results are not representative. My followers do not control the circumstances for how their vaccinated friends die.

Are they under-reporting “natural cause” deaths? Maybe but, based on how accurately my previous surveys match up with surveys of unbiased audiences, I doubt it.

But I’d be delighted to be proven wrong. One small problem: nobody will dare ask the question.

In the past, we ran multiple surveys where the audience was neutral and picked by the survey company. Those surveys showed the number of people killed by the vaccine was comparable to the number killed. For example, this survey showed

Fact check me! I dare you.

The way to fact check me is to do your own survey which allows comments on the death exactly like my survey and see how that works out for you.

I dare CNN or any mainstream news media to do a survey like mine.

But they won’t because they know what will happen. It would be game over for the vaccine. None of them will look because it’s not about finding the truth. It’s about maintaining the propaganda so the people never figure out they’ve been lied to. Because when they do, boy, are they going to be upset. You can bank on that.

Corroboration from massive insurance company database in Germany

I never rely on single surveys, anecdotes, etc. The results I presented above are consistent with everything else I’ve learned about these vaccines.

But if you are a new reader and not convinced by any of the data I’ve presented over the past year on my Substack, then I have a special treat for you: The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic Was Just Released. I’ll be talking about this data in a subsequent post. My critics will need to explain this:

and this:

MISSION:IMPOSSIBLE task would be easier at this point in the narrative.

Are we done?

My article, Why can’t we talk about it? now has nearly 100 debate topics that nobody wants to talk about. If you haven’t seen it recently, check it out!

Are we done? It seems at this point that more evidence won’t change anything; the evidence on the table is overwhelming and they won’t even debate 1 question from that list.

What do you think?