Say Envirowatch Rangitikei: “This is the USA VAERS data base summary for the 9th July. This data base now has around 3 months of data which has not been loaded yet. VAERS is acknowledged as capturing around 1% of actual injury and death. However, I believe that this reporting rate will be slightly higher with CV V. If we generously assume an above average reporting rate of 5% (which is the rate acknowledged for the NZ Medsafe reporting) — you will need to multiply these numbers by 20 to get a more accurate picture.”
This video incorrectly concludes that covid vaccines are 52 more dangerous than all other vaccine products combined.
With more data, other conclusions could be drawn e.g. if there are 104 times as many covid vaccinations than all others combined, then its only half as dangerous as other vaccines.
As data from non Covid vaccines is reported from the beginning of 1990, this could underestimate deaths because self reporting over 30 years ago was lower than it is today. So a conclusion could be that more deaths are reported now than were ever reported in the past.
I am not saying that my hypothesis are correct, just that the conclusions drawn by the video are not supported by the limited dataset available; don’t fall into the trap of giving credence to cherry picked data.
“VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.”
Source: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html