Things are getting nasty for opponents of the Experimental Medical Treatments in several countries…
SASKATCHEWAN: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represents Dr. Francis Christian, Clinical Professor of General Surgery at the University of Saskatchewan and a practising surgeon in Saskatoon. Dr. Christian was called into a meeting today, suspended from all teaching responsibilities effective immediately, and fired from his position with the University of Saskatchewan as of September 2021.
There is a recording of Dr. Christian’s meeting today between Dr. Christian and Dr. Preston Smith, the Dean of Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Dr. Susan Shaw, the Chief Medical Officer of the Saskatchewan Health Authority, and Dr. Brian Ulmer, Head of the Department of Surgery at the Saskatchewan College of Medicine.
In addition, the Justice Centre will represent Dr. Christian in his defence of a complaint that was made against him and an investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan. The complaint objects to Dr. Christian having advocated for the informed consent of Covid vaccines for children.
Dr. Christian has been a surgeon for more than 20 years and began working in Saskatoon in 2007. He was appointed Director of the Surgical Humanities Program and Director of Quality and Patient Safety in 2018 and co-founded the Surgical Humanities Program. Dr. Christian is also the Editor of the Journal of The Surgical Humanities.
On June 17, Dr. Christian released a statement to over 200 doctors which contained his concerns regarding giving the Covid shots to children. In it he noted that he is pro-vaccine, and that he did not represent any group, the Saskatchewan Health Authority, or the University of Saskatchewan. “I speak to you directly as a physician, a surgeon, and a fellow human being.” Dr. Christian noted that the principle of informed consent was sacrosanct and noted that a patient should always be “fully aware of the risks of the medical intervention, the benefits of the intervention, and if any alternatives exist to the intervention.”
“This should apply particularly to a new vaccine that has never before been tried in humans… before the vaccine is rolled out to children, both children and parents must know the risks of m-RNA vaccines,” he wrote.
Dr. Christian expressed concern that he had not come across “a single vaccinated child or parent who has been adequately informed” about Covid vaccines for children.
The Council’s media release last week stated: “For this Long-Term Plan, we have maintained our levels of service to the community, such as swimming pool opening hours and frequency of roadside mowing, with only one specific change – the removal of the recycling facility at the Waikanae greenwaste and recycling site on Park Avenue.
“Council needs to make changes where services are not equitable and where funds could be better spent elsewhere.”
But the Greenwaste site is staying…for a year
However, says the Council, it was able to confirm a one-year agreement with Composting New Zealand that will see the Greenwaste facility retained at no cost to ratepayers.
It’s very apparent from his strenuous efforts to close the recycling facility, including bullying and abuse of opponents — including Waikanae’s elected members, and former Ward councillor Michael Scott is also opposed to its closure — that Mr Maxwell has other plans for the area that it occupies. It’s probably no coincidence that a year from now should be about when Summerset will start construction of its intended neighbouring retirement village.
Mr Maxwell’s publicly stated concern about the cost of the recycling facility to Ratepayers simply doesn’t ring true. He’s never had any concern about squandering hundreds of thousands of dollars a year on external legal opinions and other reports to support his positions. Even the alleged $123,000 a year for this facility is trivial in the scope of the budget his empire has.
As has been previously observed, the alleged cost of transport from the Waikanae site to the Otaihanga site has been amplified 5 times in 3 years. Hmm…really? What is Mr Maxwell actually counting? The cost of secondary transport from Otaihanga to somewhere else in the country? These are the sorts of manipulations we’ve seen before — creative accounting it’s called. It’s again probably no co-incidence that the Summerset plans date back to 2018, announced to the public at the beginning of 2019.
What sort of message does closing a recycling facility send?
Environmentalists like Cr Sophie Handford are understandably appalled. Her comments as well as those of Cr Jackie Elliott — who we don’t often agree with, but do on this occasion — are on this video of last Thursday’s Council meeting, which starts at the appropriate stage below:
The Icelandic newspaper Stundinreports that a key witness in the U.S. prosecution of Julian Assange has admitted in an interview with the outlet that he fabricated critical accusations in the indictment against the WikiLeaks founder.
“A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder,” Stundin reports. “The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justice and FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.”
Obviously it’s a model, and not of a real place. This was one of the model railway layouts exhibited in the Waikanae Memorial Hall in mid April (see earlier post).
One of our regular readers is MAGA Mike who came to national attention in 2019 with his two campaigns of opposition to PM Jacinda Ardern. The first was the production and marketing of red baseball caps reading “Make Ardern Go Away” styled after the “Make America Great Again” caps used by Donald Trump and his supporters in 2016. Mike’s caps are also available in a variety of colours including camo and blue, because in America red is the colour of the Republican Party but in NZ that of Labour (the standard socialist/communist colour). The two parties are almost opposites in ideology.
Mike decided to produce his version of the cap following PM Jacinda’s hastily announced gun grab in March 2019 following the Christchurch mosque shootings by a foreign visitor. Law-abiding firearms owners had guns of certain descriptions confiscated in return for often inadequate compensation. The Jacinda government also completely disregarded the views of the firearms community, eloquently represented by (now ACT MP) Nicole McKee.
The second was a “Turn Ardern” campaign when one of the weekly woman’s magazines put her on the cover. “Turn Ardern” encouraged people to turn around the magazines in newsagents and supermarkets to show the back cover and not the front.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, Far Left Jacindanistas unleashed a torrent of hate directed at him.
During the Jacinda government-ordered witch-hunt that year for right wing extremists by Police, he received a visitation from the Waffen-Schutzstaffel in common with many others up and down the country. They also tried to visit him when communist activists Byron Clark and John Williams falsely accused him of sharing the mosque shooter’s banned video. But he was not home and they phoned to say they were at his house, He said he did not want to talk to them.
Hard Left types in the media have also set out to defame him. Marc Daalder* of Newsroom/The Spinoff, a delusional obsessive who interviewed him at the time, claimed that he is a “white supremacist”, despite knowing that Mike’s wife is Thai and his two children, aged 6 and 9 are mixed race. Daalder, a communist-globalist and fierce opponent of nationalism, continues to tweet the false allegation that Mike is a “white supremacist.” Mike looked into taking a defamation case but it was going to be too expensive.
One or more people complained to TradeMe to have the caps banned. Initially they did, but then thought better of it after the intervention of broadcaster Sean Plunket. Daalder then contacted TradeMe to try, unsuccessfully, to get them banned a second time.
While Legacy Media attention boosted sales of the caps, which now total several thousand, they are not his prime business which is direct selling electric-assisted quality bikes directly from the factory. You may think bicycles would be thought favourably of by greenies, but their secular saint obviously matters more to them. This business too, was targeted by the Far Left, with fake negative reviews put on the webpage, some of which are below. Because of the labels he has been given, Mike rebranded the business Alt-Right eBikes. — “My eBikes are so far right they only go round in circles. Clockwise” 🙂 The fake reviews stopped after the rebranding (probably the Extreme Left don’t want to be seen buying at a business with such a name).
Knowing how vile and violent these people can be, however, he installed full CCTV and doubled the height of the fence and gates around his house.
He tells us: “I developed a condition of involuntary shaking after the stories were written about me being a far right extremist. I was worried what my parents and friends would think and I feared loss of income to my business and thought I would loose my firearms license.
“This was a hard thing to go through and I lost quite a bit of weight due to stress-caused loss of appetite and lack of sleep. But I feel stronger for having gone through this experience.”
* Marc Daalder is a young American (ca. 25) whose parents are influential, and who, after attending Amherst College at a cost of $US 127,000 per annum, seems to have been planted here, landing a job as senior political reporter for Newsroom NZ. His father, Ivo Daalder, is President of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and has served since July 2013. He was the U.S. Permanent Representative on the Council of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization from May 2009 to July 2013. He is reportedly a specialist in European security. His mother, Elisa D. Harris is Nonresident Senior Research Scholar at the Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland.
Story at-a-glance Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology. He has grave concerns about the lack of transparency of side effects, censoring of discussion and the lack of informed consent that these bring Free SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is biologically active — contrary to initial assumptions — and causes severe problems. […]
Karl Webber took this atmospheric photo from the back of his motor boat travelling from the island to the mainland; the scintillating effect on the water is enhanced by the wake. Karl has a knack of capturing great sunsets at the right time 🙂
Bruce McFadgen tries to repudiate Price’s findings
By Ian Bradford
The Poukawa excavations were meticulously carried out by Russell Price over a number of years. In the early years of the excavations, scientists were open and honest about their work. That all began to change in the 1970’s.
The crucifixion of Russell Price began seriously in 1978. A little known individual Bruce McFadgen released an article. He released the report under the auspices of the Victoria University Geology Department. McFadgen is supposed to have visited the Poukawa site in 1973 but Russell Prices neighbours cannot recall the visit having taken place.
This was supposed to have been a formal archaeological dig on David Buddos farm but no permission was ever asked or given. David Buddo was Russell Price’s neighbour. The Geology Department of Victoria University had no involvement with the alleged McFadgen dig.
Scientific support for Russell Price
In fact, by 1970 three individuals from the Geology Department had visited the site and were all in agreement that Russell Price was correct in his findings. These three were H Wellman, B.Kohn and C Vucetich who were supported by pedologist A. Pullar.
As mentioned previously, a group of scientists (probably including the above), aligned with Russell Price prepared a written statement of support. This was generally not for publication. However, here is one part of that statement, but the writer remains anonymous.
“Occupation of the site has continued over a long period. The older occupation appears to have commenced prior to the start of the peat formation and hence also before the water level of ancient Lake Poukawa had reached its highest level. If the rate of peat formation has been substantially uniform then peat started forming at about post glacial sea level minimum say 4500 years ago. The stratigraphically lowest discoveries lie beneath the peat and may conceivably pre-date 4500 years ago. The site demonstrates human occupation of this area of much greater antiquity than anything previously anticipated.”
The dishonest, devious Bruce McFadgen
McFadgen’s report was released after the retirement of Dr Rafter from his position of head of the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences. Before retirement, Rafter had written to Price about some readings which gave dates more recent than expected. Russell Price gave a very logical explanation. He had started a dig in some low ground near a fence line. Previously, all his digs have been on higher ground which was never covered in water. His new dig was in peat soil which had been previously sodden. By then it had 42 years to dry out. It was extensively cracked. It also, over the years, had shrunk so that the Taupo ash was very close to the surface. The ash band was wavy not flat. Shallow ploughing had cut through some of the high points of the ash and the charcoal of the Maori occupation had fallen down through the breaks in the ash band. Charcoal and ash also fell down the shrinkage cracks. Russell Price considered this location unsuitable for any valid results.
Now Price’s letter of explanation of the unsuitability of the site had been within Government department records for 4 years and could have been read by McFadgen. In his 1978 report McFadgen mentions all of the things Price had mentioned in his letter to Rafter. He gave these things as reasons why the dating of Price from his high, dry land digs were incorrect.
So whereas Russell Price saw no merit in carrying on with such a low site, McFadgen deliberately chose it for his archaeological probe so that is gave these negative attributes. Price and his colleagues only dug in locations where all the layers lay undisturbed. They always inspected the Taupo ash band to make sure no cracks were visible before digging down further. The position of moa bones and artifacts were recorded at every level.
If the integrity of Price’s work was to be tested then why dig in a place that he had regarded as unsuitable. It seemed like a deliberate act on the part of McFadgen.
McFadgen’s dig sites would have been under water till 1931.They therefore produced predictably poor results. Samples taken under the Taupo ash showed a young age. From McFadgen’s point of view this seems to have been the whole purpose of what can be construed as a very underhand exercise to destroy Price by false association and innuendo.
The integrity of Russell Price
Farmer neighbours David and Bill Buddo, leading scientists, friends and close associates saw how crestfallen Price was in the last five years of his life, following McFadgen’s clumsy, unwarranted defamation of his careful work. School teacher Ivan Cash worked with Russell Price on weekends for a year.
He was taken by the sincerity and honesty of the man. Russell just found things and let the experts tell him what he had found. He described Russell as being astute, knowledgeable, observant and careful.
Price had shown Cash a moa bone with three toes that bore deep cuts in its surface. Price said he had excavated it from the blue pug clay below the intact Waimihia ash and that the DSIR had dated it at 5280 years ago.
Those who worked with Price came to realise just how entrenched, determined and vicious the academic adversaries, opposing Price’s findings actually were.
The indigenous Maori movement
Just when it looked like we were going to have full disclosure of our long term history the clobbering machine went into full swing. We were not permitted to have this forbidden knowledge. Thereafter, New Zealand archaeological research in this sphere was locked down and has now been the case for over fifty years. The United Nations foisted the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on New Zealand. This had the effect of dividing the country with the central theme that Maori are the only people to have ever occupied pre-colonial New Zealand. Thus one group is empowered while the other is disenfranchised.
How did this all come about? In 1971 the New Zealand born Polynesians formed the Polynesian Black Panther Party, influenced by the USA equivalent. Maori initially had little interest, but later alliances were formed. The unions at the time were heavily Marxist. They seized on the opportunity to sow discontent and discord to further their cause. They funded activists to be sent to Russia, China or Cuba for indoctrination in destabilising tactics.
Among the dissidents at the time was Donna Awatere who seemed to adore mass murderer Ché Guevara. Awatere went to Cuba in 1979. She had an ally in Syd Jackson a core member of the pre-eminent Maori pressure group of the time.
The purposely manufactured inaccurate portrayal of our history rose to a crescendo through the 1970’s. It began to infiltrate universities and government departments.
Former studies about pre-colonial human habitation derived from Maori oral traditions and archaeological evidence began to disappear from the library shelves, to be replaced by suitably sterilised Maori-supremacy based history.
In the mid 1970’s the use of the incorrect version of the Treaty of Waitangi a marvellous opportunity for exploitation of the differences in the formal Royal Style Treaty could occur. So over the following years the argument was that Maori had NOT ceded sovereignty in 1840, that they were pre-eminent and supreme as the indigenous people and that non-Maori were second class citizens with only the right to be in the country.
Maori supremacists had turned a benign and friendly treaty document of unification, which had stood for 140 years, into a new document of apartheid. Our older true account books were replaced by cultural Marxists versions of socially engineered history that promoted Maori as victims of imperialism.
It was also the era of manufactured guilt where European New Zealanders were pressured to feel guilt for sins that had never been committed by their ancestors – sins that required heavy financial compensation for aggrieved Maori in order to make amends. Increasingly there was to be no mention of any people occupying NZ before the arrival of Polynesians in the 13th century AD and any evidence to the contrary has been censored and buried.
The evidence of Russell Price and others proves pre-Polynesian settlement
Dynamic evidence of long term pre-Maori occupation of New Zealand found by Russell Price and others, and proven beyond reasonable doubt was simply ignored. New Zealand archaeology was quickly reduced to a farce with unwanted results subject to an embargo by Maori intervention, so that sites were locked down, shrouded in secrecy and unwanted discoveries simply destroyed.
Russell, your work is appreciated by many of us. We shall continue to push for what is right and we assure you, your patient excavations was not in vain.
The fact that Maori are NOT indigenous is important on two counts.
Firstly, Maori have used the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to gain millions of dollars of ordinary New Zealanders money through the Waitangi Tribunal, and from the government.
Secondly, the proposed New Zealand History syllabus for Year 1-10 students, which some call Maori Studies, says our history starts in the thirteenth century. It is perfectly clear that our history began long before that. How can a history syllabus be written that leaves out hundreds of years of our history?
(Acknowledgement: I would like to acknowledge Martin Doutré, whose excellent recording of Russell Price’s excavations has been the basis of my last two parts to this article.)
