by Christopher Ruthe

The ‘Transport hub‘ being built (very slowly) at Paraparaumu Station has had a $9 million impost on Ratepayers. The hub is where train meets bus. Transport hubs are the responsibility of the Greater Wellington Regional Council. Yet this project has been built at almost entirely KCDC Ratepayer expense when it should have been funded by the NZTA and Greater Wellington Regional Council — at no cost to the Kapiti Ratepayer.

Greater Wellington Council has confirmed this saying: “Our funding model involves Greater Wellington paying 49% of the total cost of all transport hubs, and Waka Kotahi funds 51%. 

Why did KCDC not get the funding it should have? The only rational explanation is that KCDC wanted to avoid having a consultation with the NZTA and GWRC and preferred to burden its ratepayers for a pretentious unnecessary attempt to create the great Paraparaumu Plaza. Annual maintenance costs are undisclosed. 

The project is really a grand European piazza/plaza situated in one of the ugliest parts of the Kapiti Coast. Facing not glistening ocean, but rear ends of commercial buildings beside noisy railway tracks and in the windiest site in Paraparaumu, thanks to the nearby hills to the east.

In a letter KCDC said that this ‘attractive new plaza’ will be a nice place to wait for trains. 

Perhaps trainspotting will be the latest craze for Kapiti youth?

The dozens of seats at the station, ready to be installed

No shelters were intended

There was no shelter for passengers running from bus to train who were going to be soaked to the skin in any rain. It was only because of the Kapiti Improvement Society raising concerns with the Greater Wellington Regional Council that there will be shelters, paid for by GWRC and not by KCDC and its $49 million budget. There is also loss of access to handicapped people because of lack of proper provision for taxis.

It required action by Kapiti Improvement Society to just get bus shelters built, by dealing directly with GWRC and confirming they are paying. KCDC continues to throw ratepayer money away with no concern. 

Blocking the pedestrian underpass was intended

KCDC was going to block the sheltered underpass from the station to Coastlands to make people use the new pedestrian crossing over the road, Again this would expose them to weather and traffic rather than the safety and dry of the underpass. After hundreds of thousands of dollars had been spent on this absurdity, public pressure has meant the current underpass remains … for the moment.

No public consultation; Not in the Long Term Plan

There has been no public consultation on this expensive project. When asked why it was not indicated as a major project in the Long Term Plan, KCDC pointed to a pedestrian crossing marked “P” on a document of 2017 =- before the grandiose concept had been conceived. KCDC said the people approved this, so approved the $9 million project. 

P5 (above) shows nothing of the grand plaza, just a pedestrian link.

The Local Government Act requires the following:

“The long-term plan (LTP) must

  • Describe the council’s activities and the community outcomes it aims to achieve.
  • Show accountability to the community.
  • Provide an opportunity for participation by the public in council decision-making processes. , and specific funding and financial management policies and information.”

None of this appears to have been done. 

The Grand Plaza will be a tourist hot spot?

KCDC spent hundreds of thousands of Ratepayer dollars preparing videos and other material to persuade Ratepayers of the grand new feature that will draw visitors. KCDC declares  “An attractive public plaza will be created. The plaza will include landscaping features, shade, seating, and lighting… creating people-friendly, functional and safe spaces. KCDC’s expensive video (or one of them) is on YouTube here.

All the pohutukawa trees at the station were for the axe. Kapiti Improvement Society (KIS) became aware, stepped in and managed to save 3 of the trees (see this post —Eds).

This was all sanctioned by the previous Council. Will the current Council show a greater willingness to hold staff to account and ensure that there is real consultation on major projects?

Will it ensure it gets funding from the government or GWRC when it is available? At the present time the matter is under investigation.